I’m flattered, but all I am doing is explaining to you the work of others.I find it funny that you think that you've found some magic bullet with DNA.
Here is some coded information that came from a sender:DNA is a chemical system for CODEING INFORMATION. INFORMATION only comes from intelligence and is not found "creating itself" in nature. In other words, INFORMATION always has a SENDER.
https://www.atnf.csiro.au/outreach/education/everyone/pulsars/pulseprofile.gif[/img
Looks a bit like a trace of the regular click you might get from a clockwork metronome, designed carefully by a clockmaker to keep strict time for a musician to follow. Actually it is the signal received in a radio telescope from a pulsar star, one called PSR B0329+54. Pulsars spin unbelievably fast and have a beam of radiation coming from the axis of rotation, so it works a bit like the regular pulses of light from a rotating lighthouse. The pulses are so regular that the discoverers of pulsars Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Antony Hewish nicknamed the signal LGM-1, for Little Green Men. The illusion of intelligent design is powerful, but pulsars are just stars behaving according to the physics governing the stages of their lives. There is no intelligence behind the signal.
It would help to move the conversation forwards if you could get to the part where you explain how you have eliminated common descent as a possible explanation for the universality of the genetic code. I think I have only read you denying it.Again, DNA is evidence of a COMMON DESIGNER and not "common descent from a single original creature".
The evidence of intelligent design is clear in the signal graph above too. But it is an illusion that plays on how the human mind works.The evidence is self-evident to anyone that is has not decided to reject it first.
Stuart