The right to consent over what medical treatments or procedures you have or don't have.what rights are you referring to?
Stuart
The right to consent over what medical treatments or procedures you have or don't have.what rights are you referring to?
The right to consent over what medical treatments or procedures you have or don't have.
Stuart
I'm sure you'll use your influence here to best effect Stripe.Not for long.
That's true it isn't. But the baby does have an *effect* on the mother's body, which is where the "my body" idea comes from. But that idea is self serving and ignorant of the baby involved.Then tell Stuu he is wrong. The mother's body is not the baby's body.
Nope. I'm pro-death penalty in principle, the problem is the practice in the USA.You're anti-death penalty, except for innocent babies.
As I said the interplay is complex and in the case of rape I think it is justified if the woman continues to feel violated by a pregnancy.That's the stupidest thing you've ever said. You cannot argue for the right to choose without condoning both choices.
Not an argument from popularity. It's a statement of reality. In a democratic society, you're not going to get enough people to support it.Ah, the argument from popularity. The wail of defeat of the evolutionist.
No Value for life | |
Apparently you can't trust people to make their own choices in life, you must step in where you think other people have crossed your line? lain:if a woman chooses to have a healthy limb amputated, should she be allowed to?
if a woman chooses to exercise her parental rights and refuse lifesaving treatment for her injured child, should she be allowed to?
One is not pro life/anti-abortion no matter how much they defend when they vote for abortion candidates. This is not an endorse for the GOP, chrysostom.
Apparently you can't trust people to make their own choices in life, you must step in where you think other people have crossed your line? lain:
My comment was more aimed at your intent rather than in specific cases. You seem to be implying that you would seek to control the lives of those whom you conclude are making faulty choices, right?actually, the two cases i presented were real cases that we discussed recently in a medical ethics class - in each case, the state intervened - the psychologically disturbed woman who wanted to amputate a healthy limb was prevented from doing so and the woman who wanted to refuse treatment for her child was also prevented from doing so.
Are you God?we already do :idunno:
Well, you seemed to think that other people already had to conform to your conclusions rather than their own. But never mind I don't actually believe in God anyway.no
why do you ask?
Self abort? How would she do that?do we allow a woman to self-abort her near term baby?
Self abort? How would she do that?
I believe this has been done. It's pretty rare though. Do you think it makes a significant difference to the main point?if a woman chooses to have a healthy limb amputated, should she be allowed to?
Well no, but what has that got to do with it?if a woman chooses to exercise her parental rights and refuse lifesaving treatment for her injured child, should she be allowed to?
For babies, definitely.Nope. I'm pro-death penalty in principle.
You condone the execution of a baby for the crimes of his father.As I said the interplay is complex and in the case of rape I think it is justified if the woman continues to feel violated by a pregnancy.
And here's a false dichotomy. It's both. Murder is popular, which is no argument against what I say.Not an argument from popularity. It's a statement of reality.
That didn't stop the homos 10 years ago.In a democratic society, you're not going to get enough people to support it.
Are you suggesting that Stripe's habits of running away from debates he is losing and stalking people for opportunities to have them banned doesn't flatter his reputation?I'm sure you'll use your influence here to best effect Stripe.
I believe this has been done. It's pretty rare though. Do you think it makes a significant difference to the main point?
Well no, but what has that got to do with it?
Stuart
Now you come to mention it...Are you suggesting that Stripe's habits of running away from debates he is losing and stalking people for opportunities to have them banned doesn't flatter his reputation?
Stuart