Search results

Yeah, yeah, more sound and fury signifying nothing. You are skilled at trotting out inflammatory, baiting language; less so at backing your position with credible facts. Please tell us: exactly which position of the "leftist totalitarian state" do you believe violates any law or reasonable...

First of all, you did not simply say the risk is very small, you said it was less than being likely less "than the possibility of hikers dying from falling space debris". You, of course, pulled that "fact" out of thin air. Second, since a responsible person would not make a claim without...

Where is your evidence that "was government money to be mined from each covid death reported¨? Now then, let's talk about this "every death reported as a covid death" thing as it is one of the many untruths you guys perpetrate. Although in this case in particular, you can arguably be acquitted...

Ok, let's take this one part at a time. First, a dramatic reduction in flu is to be expected given the restrictions we had to live under due to covid. Likewise, with more people at home one could expect fewer gunshot injuries. As for heart attacks, where is your data?

I assume you made this up - very creative, I must say.

Humour me - what science? (this should be fun....)

What risks? And, again, you hide information. Even if there is zero risk of death from Covid and a non-zero risk of death from the vaccine, the vaccine may still be a wise choice since the young person can transmit covid to others.

Nice try. Boy, you must really believe posters here are dumb. Oooops, wait a minute...... All I am doing is providing examples that, rightly, cast the credibility of the VAERS source into question. Would a reliable, database of medical events that is properly managed, presumably by medical...

You evaded my point (of course you did - you have to). The relevant question, of course, is this: is there an increase in strokes (for example) after the vaccine as compared to the normal rate of incidence of strokes (i.e. in the absence of the vaccine). Besides, your post is a strawman -...

As usual, you distort by presenting one side of a 2-sided coin. The real issue, of course, is not the threat posed by the vaccine but rather the threat posed by the vaccine as compared to the threat posed by covid. But, of course, you cannot afford to play the game fairly since that would...

What real science? You appear to simply dismiss evidence you do not like as propaganda. That will work with the nitwits here, but not with others.

Then people would not take any of these means of travel unless, for some reason, the need for travel was so dire that they would be willing to take a 2% or 4% risk. Let's be clear: this figure of 98% is a trick - the naive are duped into thinking "gee, that's not a very bid risk". Well, it...

Such an opinion is completely out of touch with the way human beings actually evaluate risks. If the risk of dying in a plane crash were 2%, people would not even dream of getting in an airplane.

From the University and of California at San Fransisco: There are several strands of evidence supporting the efficacy of masks. One category of evidence comes from laboratory studies of respiratory droplets and the ability of various masks to block them. An experiment using high-speed video...

It is in the database, and so it gets counted. When way 2 go mindlessly posts his misinformation from VAERS, that absurd report of explosive diarrhea and a "touch of the AIDS" is counted as an effect of the vaccine, if we are to believe way 2 go. Here is yet another cutie of a report from...

Every single day I get into my car and drive to work after eating breakfast. Such preponderance of correlation means jack-squat - my eating breakfast in no way "causes" me to drive to work.

False. I have never posted anything that would lead a person who can read English properly to conclude that I believe that believe vaccines never cause health problems. You will not be able to show that I made such a moronic claim.

To repeat, here is an actual report from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS): "Explosive Diarhea and a touch of the AIDS" In honor of this gem, I offer the following limerick: VAERS, surely truth mas-que-rades Nutjob reports, throughout it pervades One whackjob, quoth he The...

No, this is not correct reasoning. Just because there have been some problems does not mean we should stop. If seatbelts kill 1 person for every 100 persons saved by them, do you we tell everybody to stop wearing seatbelts?

For suspicion to fall on a vaccine relative to some adverse health event X, the rate of occurrence of X in those who have been vaccinated would need to be higher than it would be in the absence of vaccination. Or there would need to be some other systemic change in the pattern of occurrence of...