Search results

Liar - you do not even have a shred of evidence for the statement in bold.

Liar, or idiot, or both. This is either a demonstration of severe mental impairment on your part and / or a a demonstration that your have no moral standards at all when it comes to truth-telling.

Learn to read, moron. I never claimed that breakthrough infections did not occur.

What science?

What data show a marginal impact?

What utter tripe - you are a painful embarrassment to the reputation of the Church. Here is what is so pernicious about fundamentalism - it gives people a rationalization for their sin. Problem: Don't like what science says? Solution: Adopt an absurdly simplistic, cartoonish world-view that...

Pinhead. We have been through this before: Let me try to makes this as simple as possible: Say you have 100 people who don’t get a vaccine, and you find that 10 of them catch the disease. So the baseline risk of getting it is 10%. And suppose that 100 other people get the vaccine, and only 1...

What, exactly, is your point about Sweden?

You are a heartless jerk. And you probably do not know the difference between a differential equation and a bag of pork rinds. Oh and yes: you are an habitual liar - as if that is news to anyone.

Lifesitenews? Well, you asked for it: Fact-checking website Snopes described LifeSiteNews in 2016 as "a known purveyor of misleading information".[21] Paul Moses wrote for Commonweal in 2021 that LifeSiteNews coverage "feigns journalistic accuracy, but misleads through omission".[13] The...

So where are we now in our retrospective tour of the sources you anti-vaxxers, anti-face mask types have cited? - we have an organization headed by a nutcase who doctored a picture of Barack Obama to appeal to racist sentiments; - we have side-effects like "explosive diarhea and a touch of the...

And leave us not overlook that redoubtable fount of all knowledge virological - the illustrious Simone Gold. At least one of you cited her as an "expert". What was this responsible bastion of society doing on January 6, 2021? Seeing patients? Performing research?. Nay. On January 5, 2021, Gold...

And then there is the always entertaining appeals to the VAERS database to support the lie that vaccines produce all sorts of problems. Here is one entry from that reputable source: "explosive diarrhea and a touch of the AIDS"

All right, let the fun begin. Since some of you are discrediting the sources I use, let's see what "experts" you guys consult. Marke cited the results of a survey of the "Association of American Physician and Surgeons" (AAPS). Let us see what these guys are all about: The Association of...

Of course you aren't - you guys do not believe in real experts with real credentials. You instead defer to yahoos who make videos in their basements.

Code for: no evidence.

Now now, Trump was not all that bad.

Yes, if. So what are you saying? Were there bad cause and effect assumptions? Now, prithee, toddle off and make up something up out of thin air to provide in reply.

Didn't do you your research, did you? Through its Science Policy Centre, the society acts as an advisor to the UK Government, the European Commission and the United Nations on matters of science. Yeah, real amateurs. Steven Hawking was a member - real moron, that guy. It is almost as if you...

Where is your evidence. Here is mine. From the Royal Society: As expected, the different estimates show some variation. Still, all suggest that the effect of introducing face mask regulation reduces the reproduction number by 15–40%, a rather big reduction for one single preventive measure...