Search results

That's as far as you got before making your first error. Knowing every possible move does not imply knowing every move that will be made and thus it is not omniscience. Having the ability to stop anything doesn't imply either a need, a requirement nor even the willingness to do so. Further...

Excellent quote! She is too generous to Lewontin though. At best, he's honest about being dishonest. Anyone who was actually honest would find something else to do rather than continuing to take money to finance what is known to be a scientific dead end.

Making a claim is easy. Proving it is something else entirely. In short... Saying it doesn't make it so!

How so? Show me the syllogism. Further, it isn't my logic. Jesus laid down His own life. He did it willingly and had He not submitted Himself to it, no one would have been able to play a finger on Him. John 10:17 “Therefore My Father loves Me, because I lay down My life that I may take it...

I'm not harping and my response to your post is based on the fact that our respective posts make the same point. That passage in Ezekiel is like a phantom passage, SoT. There isn't 10% of Christianity that even knows that it exists and nearly all of those who do know that it exists, ignore it...

Laughable insanity!!!! Hopefully no one bothers to read it. Jesus didn't just heal people, He rose HIMSELF from the dead! John 10:17 “Therefore My Father loves Me, because I lay down My life that I may take it again. 18 No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have power to lay...

Stupidity. Curing congenital blindness in 30 seconds or less is in accordance with the laws of nature? Raising people from the dead is in accordance with the laws of nature? Raising one's self from the dead is in accordance with the laws of nature? You're too stupid for words! Of course it...

I wrote the post immediately prior to this one before I read the post quoted above. All I can say is, you are without excuse! Wow! I'd be shaking in my boots of I were you. I mean you're in BIG trouble! Like, REALLY big!

Saying it doesn't make it so, Doug. Lie! This is so but not in the way you mean it. We are indeed all descended from Adam and we do inherit what Paul calls "the flesh" from him. However, a major part of the gospel is the Jesus' death makes it so that no one will go to Hell because of Adam's...

I am not wrong. I stand by every syllable. You want to apply general truths like those found throughout the book of proverbs to every specific case, which is an error by anyone's standard. That was supposed to be a quote? You need a new bible! Your version.... Proverbs 2:6 All wisdom comes...

That's the reason that I added that miracles are SUPER natural, by definition. Stupidity! That flatly is NOT the definition of miracle, not at least by any biblical or Christian standard. Yeah, sure. You are definitely a lunatic. No one cares about how you see it. It isn't a matter of...

In fact, the definition of a miracle is an event that CANNOT be explained by normal physical processes. Miracles are SUPER natural, by definition. That's because you are literally an idiot. Regardless, my point stands. Your secular definition of faith has nothing to do with the bible or...

That isn't what Proverbs 2:6 says, which is, I suspect, why you choose not to actually quote it. The confusion here is coming from you applying the general to the specific.

Good grief! Is there anything that you believe that isn't stupidity? This idiotic comment doesn't even follow by its own internal logic! What if you had only shown me a quid? And, on what evidence would I have taken you as "an authority who speaks the truth"? Your definition of faith is...

You should develop the habit of quoting the passages you cite so that I and others don't have to go in behind you and figure out what you're talking about. I don't have the New Testament memorized. II Peter3: 15 and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make...

None of them teach that at all. You are reading your doctrine into the text. A point I have already made. Indeed, none of your doctrine's distinctive teachings (i.e. those teachings that distinguish it from the rest of Christianity) are taught in scripture at all. The ENTIRE TULIP is 100%...

Restating your doctrine does nothing to rebut the arguments that have been presented and that prove your doctrine false.\\ God is just. Therefore Calvinism is FALSE!

LOL! You hardly ever type a post that does not presuppose my doctrine! Fools are fools, Doug! I call it as I see it - for free! Besides, don't you believe that God has predestined me to type every word? You must believe that God decreed my every word and that I would win every debate I've...

Repeating you position does not count as a rebuttal. I use God's definition. It is you who has changed to to mean "arbitrary", by your own words! Nice words but even this much is not logically compatible with you doctrine. We agree that sin is to be punished in one way or another. The problem...

On the contrary! God is just! That is my primary premise in the argument against your doctrine and it is one that you cannot deal with except to redefine what the word means, which is to not deal with it. MY DEFINITION? Did I miss something? Was I sleep walking when the English language...