Search results

Your misguided opinion is not "fact".

It really wasn't and I'm not interested in downplaying anything. I thoroughly enjoyed reading her detailed analysis and debunking of ignorance but if I carry on on that score I'll be accused of 'hero worship' again? Her scientific expertise and knowledge were simply a pleasure to read. By all...

Hardly a 'materialistic' view and if that's the best you've got given the absolute minutiae of detail she went into in that thread then... Hey, again, stick with your young earth belief. What does it ultimately matter?

Funnily enough, I decided to read through the thread in question earlier for the last coupla hours: https://theologyonline.com/threads/i-love-jesus-and-i-accept-evolution.48837/ I'm not even interested in our own occasional spats on it as neither of us IMO fare very well but so much more in...

No, that's just you resorting to the same, tired shtick. Get some new material.

The threads still there and oh yes, there were several instances and not just you to be fair but others also. The ToE isn't a "belief system" and you don't have any "evidence", credible at least to refute it. You just seem to be shackled to one of your own that denies actual science in favour...

If only. All you seem to do is throw about the word 'fallacy' when you're guilty of them yourself ironically.

Yes, it is and no, you don't. If you did, you'd realize that the ToE is not based on "speculation" for starters. That is simply ignorant and given the amount of times you've been corrected on this then ignorance really isn't an excuse.

If that were the case you'd have listened to Alate and once again you're reduced to a strawman. Of course smart people aren't always correct, nobody is. Smart people, however, aren't constrained by a system of their own making and if they engage with someone who's a professor of biology have...

No, in actual reality as in the thread. Of course, you weren't going to listen as your belief system not only seems to prevent you from entertaining anything that runs contrary to a belief in a young earth but also has you mired in a strawman argument.

The ToE is real science. If you actually are familiar with how scientific theories become formulated you'd realize that.

Well, no I'm not because I don't. The rest is way off the mark as per usual with you also...

Would it be all there surprising if there was, given the amount of conspiracy and out there stuff that is supported by some on here?

At the risk of having RD accusing me of "hero worship" again, Alate is a professor of biology and you most assuredly aren't.

No, you don't RD. You'd be better off simply being honest on the matter and admitting that your belief in a young earth is unshakable no matter what's presented. Alate educated you on the score in absolute detail and you wouldn't listen. In fact you generally 'responded' with little more than...

The theory of evolution does not 'disprove God', it's as simple as that.

Evolution doesn't rule out a creator. Get your head around that and it might not be such an issue for you.

She's a professor in biology. A former young earth creationist no less. Do your own homework.

So a complete non answer then. It's pretty obviously a parable.

Theories don't come about in science without foundation. If you don't know that then you're simply ignorant.