Search results

I used an example that was in keeping with part of your own argument. My mistake in thinking that you might have had the maturity to address the essence of it. Ho hum. Not only that, the effects of magnets and electricity can be observed outside of the 'visible' anyway. The same with all manner...

Absolutely! If there's incontrovertible proof that there was widespread fraud and that Trump had the election stolen from him then bring it on.

Okay, then refute it with some some substance then.

Heck, maybe this example will make more sense to you, maybe not but I'll try it anyway. A friend of mine has schizophrenia. Decades and longer ago he would probably be described as being 'possessed by demons' but thankfully, with the advent and progression of science in the medical field, it's...

The burden of proof is on those making the claims that there were hundreds of thousands of illegitimate ballots to start with. Never happened despite a whole load of bellyaching from 'Trumpsters'. There's a reason for that. You 'go figger' that out.

That was inadvertently funny, will give you that...

For informative purposes, here is Alate One's thread on the topic. A professor of biology in her own right and a former 'YECer' herself, she showed just how much an acceptance of actual science and having faith are far from mutually exclusive...

In essence and in context she's correct, not that that equates to 'materialism' as you erroneously conflate it as being. Science is not concerned with the 'supernatural' by way of unless you want to count paranormal science... No, there isn't, there simply isn't. If there was, then I'd have no...

What evidence? If it makes it any easier, what credible evidence? By 'credible' I mean sources that aren't out and out wingnut and dingbat sites etc that can be corroborated and verified for veracity.

If that's what you gleaned from AO's thread then you really weren't paying attention to it. Science itself is entirely neutral on the topic of evolution. It didn't come about by atheistic philosophy by way of. The theory became established because of the abundance of evidence that supports it...

More clueless...

What evidence?

No and neither did Alate. Grow up.

The thread in question was about evolution so in context there was nothing wrong with AO's statement. This is kinda lame RD.

No, it isn't as you can familiarize yourself with by looking up the definition. Even the philosophical definition doesn't hold up. Sure, science is involved in areas besides the physical so no limiting going on here. It depends on the branch.

That still isn't "materialism". What else is science involved in, the supernatural?

Nobody stole the election from him. He just lost. Get over it already.

I read it the first time. That isn't "materialism".

Trump managed his own removal from office by himself. If he hadn't been so obsessed with twitter, his own gargantuan ego and acted like his a president who was actually fit for office, he might just still be there.

Your claims can be dismissed accordingly.