Search results

I've been discussing perspective, but you have completely ignored the conversation. The evidence is generally not wrong. But the interpretation of the evidence in support of the FE has been shown to be wrong repeatedly. Take your picture of the sun is shown as two different sizes. But that...

Jesus said, if He was His only witness, then His testimony would not be true. We need other witnesses to verify the veracity of our claims. Did you get a chance to read my two responses to you? Could you respond to my non-derogatory and to-the-point replies? Or are you going to only respond to...

Dave. Please, check the lens flare. You can do it with a welding mask and a cell phone camera. We got great results relatively recently with this. This concerns the horizon. The sun should get smaller according to perspective as it retreats toward the horizon. Your picture even shows this...

Dave: My theory that you don't respond to people unless they call you names seems to be correct.

You mention the eclipse, something I didn't mention at all except as a time reference, and you don't mention checking the size of the sun sans lens-flare? Did you realize my post was about lens flare and not the eclipse? You are the one that brought up lens flare. Can you re-respond to my...

What bothers me is that Dave isn't responding in this discussion. He says the sun changes size, and we say it's lens flare. Is there a way to get rid of lens flare? Sure, easy, photographers do it all the time. Does he do it to learn the truth? Nope. He trots out another video. We say, "Dave...

So, I haven't used pejoratives against you, I have watched the videos, I went to the trouble to make an animated gif in direct response to your video. Do I need to call you names to talk with you? Again, you seem to be only respond to people that will describe you in a bad light just so you can...

The vid showed the sun first moving down and then away. Is that how it appears to everyone on earth? Down and then away? It should look like this:

I'm glad to be done with this topic. Knight is asking what I would ask now... what forces are holding up the ISS as it circles the earth?

Again, these are not the same phenomena, but two different phenomena. Both have warm and cold air, but one causes refraction and the other reflection because the construction and humidity of the air is different to cause each effect. I'm not seeing where you are seeing a contradiction. Just...

There are different phenomena that cause differing effects. There is the phenomenon of different air densities that cause light to bend, which is no different than what happens with a pencil that is partly submerged in water. And there is another phenomenon that causes light to bounce off it...

Right. In the FE model we should be seeing the Chicago skyline a lot more.

No, it is mentioned in the office before we hear about it on the radio. As far as I know it is completely unpredictable.

It's rare. Perhaps a handful of times per year of the tops of the tallest buildings. And a view of the full skyline is a once-every-few-years event.

Which ones? So your answer is "no, we aren't sure there is a relatively accurate map of the flat earth" and that's fine. I happen to work near enough to Lake Michigan across from Chicago that I can look for Chicago any day I like. When Chicago can be seen, it's a big enough deal that it is...

I had been posting answers and asking questions in an unemotional and honest matter. But you stopped responding. Is it because if the questions and answers make too much sense against the FE model that you want to have a victim/abuse/opposition-outburst excuse at the ready in order to disengage...

When I saw his first post I was already suspecting exactly what you are saying here. I wasn't sure how I could make the discussion productive, but I did know if I ever said anything as a personal attack, that it would be the excuse he would use to ignore the discussion. So I kept the discussion...

If you were only interested in engaging with people that were not launching personal attacks at you, then why did you stop discussing with me? I've never engaged in a personal attack against you, and I've kept things to their scientific and logical foundations. I don't always have time to answer...

What are you talking about? I'm talking about the video that measured the angle of the sun and moon. Your reply is referencing a website that I didn't mention. So here are a few questions that might help us get on the same page and I'll look at your website after we finish with the video. One...

Post #2566