Search results

Like all pandemics, this one was over after its first season mostly. At least the great excesses of death it brought. Now it's relegated to being more like a bad flu season, and next season it will be even weaker. Even the variants won't be as deadly (I'm talking about only the disease, not the...

I'm not sure they had one and pulled it or not. I do remember Gov. Whitmer bringing up some paper or science demonstration somewhere upon which she gave her executive order to mask up. Same with social distancing and lockdowns. Although, this CDC pdf seems to infer that masks are scientifically...

We weren't sure about mask effectiveness until more data came in. And it's in now. After other factors are taken into account, not only are masks negligibly effective in the spread of COVID, but they cause other problems related to keeping a dirty cloth on you face all day and restriction in...

Well there is that. But it seems very convenient. Like the studies that show masks work, that came out just in time to combat the charts showing that some masked and unmasked populations seemed to be affected similarly. And then more complete papers came out and data was finalized for charts...

Simply that it doesn't have long term effects studied. That's something I'd rather before I try it. And that's a good enough reason that no one should look down on people that don't want it even if they haven't had COVID. Of course, if it makes you feel better even if you have better immunity...

Could you link to the study that shows natural immunity is stronger than vaccine? I'm having trouble convincing someone that they don't need the vaccine since they've had the illness, and the way our immunity system works the vaccine won't add anything to help.

And this is why EV's aren't ready to be in everyone's driveway. But as soon as the batteries are good enough and cheap enough, they will be. Although, even if they have a breakthrough on batteries, it still won't be mainstream for at least a few years. ICE technology will still be around for...

Oh, but you are playing. You are playing the part exactly the way your overlords want you to play. They only need good people to do nothing in order for them to succeed. Instead of throwing out the baby with the bathwater, work to understand both sides of the argument. I understand your side...

You're too late to keep spreading that lie. Fauci already admitted that asymptomatic spread never drives an aerosol borne illness before he needed asymptomatic spread to be the main driver, conveniently, for COVID. So, just like masks, suddenly new papers came out to support the narrative where...

There you go. A great example of projection. You accuse me of being a nasty name caller when in reality I describe you while you do the name calling. Stick to the reality of the situation. Read the charts and understand them. Have curiosity about why those extra 140,000 young people died. Don't...

I realize that what I'm implying should be more direct. You actually do care about certain people - your government overlords. When I say I care about people I mean the little people. The ones that aren't in the government leadership elite. The ones that are powerless when the government attacks...

As was borne out even by the CDC, asymptomatic spread never drives an aerosolized viral disease. And the charts add powerful evidence to that truth. So you are wrong, scientifically, that we don't know who is healthy and who is sick.

But the numbers say otherwise. The pandemic got about as bad as it could get - masks and lockdowns didn't matter much to the pandemic, but they sure mattered to death and despair in all other areas of living, to the tune of killing an excess 140,000 people. That's why it matters that we care...

Only because the truth hurts. The variation on B highlights an important difference. The "then what?" includes restrictions on the government so that it does not have the authority to mandate masks, lockdowns, social distancing, vaccines. vaccine passports, or whatever other totalitarian...

You should read more charitably. I'm not being nasty, I'm just describing the kind of person you are. Really, you should be more stoic and respond to possibility "C".

You ignored the concrete part of what I said. I imagine it's because the logical conclusion of the concrete part, that I care more than you, hurts your feelings more than the concrete part matters to the truth. And I'm not slandering you. Slander is making false statements whereas I've shown...

It's C. The reaction to the pandemic was worse than the disease. Unlike you, I care not only about the sick people, but the rest of society as well.

Leftists always lie, they always double down, and in this case they show how they always project. You can always know what a leftist is doing in secret when they accuse you of it.

Just going off general perceptions. People that have driven both (not taking the problem of batteries into account), by far prefer EV's. That's a good point. However, most of the time you'd be plugging in at home over night and you wouldn't need to spend time at the electric station. That's...

Certainly you don't want the battery to be used up quickly when it is in use. But what I meant was when a great deal of current is demanded from the battery by the battery application, that the battery can deliver the required current efficiently.