Search results

Could you clarify this? There is someone that wants a theocracy? Who? Or maybe your definition of theocracy is "anyone Skeeter disagrees with".

Oh, yeah, I guess he could have just read the post...

It's a good idea if the benefits outway the costs.

The biologist user Alate_one. She said it because that is the consensus.

LOL, you're right. I guess it could be clarified that the comic nature of different presentations defending common descent is on a sliding scale, with the video from UN being on the "more comical" end of the scale.

Presenter gives cartoon version of evolution, but audience accepts it because of confirmation bias.

I heard that temp records of the last few years, and still continuing today, are determined by both actual measurements and when a measurement is unavailable it gets reported using computer models. What is questionable is the large number of stations that are listed as non-reporting to the tune...

That depends on the state. The list of states I provided does not apply to your claim.

?

If you want to go that way, that's a way to do it in every state.

I said it was relevant. Just less so than other questions. So let's see if we talk this through can we find the more relevant questions.

All states can change their rules tomorrow, and they have been largely capricious in the past. So that question isn't very relevant. Currently, those states that don't require notification are considered the best states for transferring educational value to. These are: Alaska, Connecticut...

If I recall, what they did to Green the Deserts does not scale in the way the speaker claimed it could. So the idea has basically fallen by the wayside.

Please clarify. It could be you are talking about something like the debate between the Arminians and the Calvinists. Is that correct?

He's not a hypocrite. He's all for kids dying before AND after they are born!

Yowza! No investigation of an explosion that destroyed property? This could be a big deal for reasons we don't see at the moment.

This was more accurate some years ago. And what's more, this situation isn't as bad for society as our current one. In this scenario where a boy will never get a girl because his standards are too high, one just gets a male that never gets married. But the situation we have today is where the...

Why?

What is the reason for this?

I thought there was a scheme someone proposed using entangle particles?