Search results

These ideas are simply wrong. Failed science is science that sees the evidence and then comes to an illogical or irrational conclusion. An example might be where "scientifically" we all know that salt causes high blood pressure. Before the truth came out, my father who's degree was in biology...

Wow, I didn't know brewers yeast was so healthy. I'm not surprised though. If you can't get non-processed brewers yeast from the store, is it possible to make your own? I get a wonderful slurry of used yeast with every batch of homebrew I make. Perhaps one could take the slurry directly. Or, to...

Oh, yeah. I didn't proof read that. I took "documentary hypothesis" from JR's post and added 'theory' since it was opposite the tablet theory. I'll edit.

When our old meter was exchanged for the smart one, I mentioned to the installer this would be used to shut off people's power for political reasons. He laughed pretty hard and agreed with me because most people he was installing the new meters at thought the smart meters could only be used at...

Oy, I mixed JR and RD together. Sorry about that. The JEDP document theory is clearly wrong. But the tablet theory I linked to is quite a different from the document hypothesis. In fact, I was talking with Bob Ball (don't know if you remember him. Super great guy and friend of Bob Enyart) and...

That's what happened. Moses wrote the Pentateuch, but much of the material he wrote about was from former authors for the book of Genesis. You can read about the tablet theory here. Therefore, the creation was does have two stories, one by God and the other by Adam - of the same event. JD's...

You said, "those who value the empirical method" is what makes someone scientifically minded. And by that definition people that believe in life after death (specifically because they were created that way) are more scientifically minded. They are people that properly use the empirical method...

They could be. Figuring out who of the excess deaths is dying from what is almost impossible. What we do know is that our leaders are presiding over excess deaths caused by their policies. Of course, that includes Trump and the RINOs along with the democrats... which is more than 90% of our...

That's nice. Just don't forget the numbers shown aren't actually counting outcomes compared to vaccination status directly. They use assumptions that put the unvaccinated in the worse light possible. Those that did not have a readily available record of vaccination were assumed to be...

At this time we have no way of knowing. The data was not collected. Any speculation uses studies that are estimating on factors that don't include known vaccine status, and a bias by hospitals that attempts to improve the assumed efficacy of the vaccines. However, as time goes by and with the...

And let's not forget, under Trump excess deaths not from COVID had a reason for happening. But excess deaths not from COVID should stop, or at least be lessening under Biden, but they aren't! So the hardest thing this evil bunch leading us has to do which they haven't figured out yet is a way...

I read it. Now that everyone can see how bad the "vaccines" are, I hope they stand up against the government a little more resolutely on the next crisis.

They way they have talked up until now you'd think they had turned into Trump-drones. So I'm glad they showed they have a critical curiosity for what could be happening behind what is presented to us.

Yes, exactly. They think Trump is still a savior, but that the forces of evil want him to be elected for their own agenda, and Trump would be playing into their hands without knowing it. Personally, I'd wish they'd see that Trump may not completely innocently be "playing into their hands".

Surprisingly, a group I lurk on is questioning their own narrative. Specifically, this group is very pro Trump to the point of wanting him to run again in 2024. However, the question has come up since Mar-a-lago that they need to consider if they are being played. Even though they think Trump...

Then according to your definition people that believe in life after death are more scientifically minded. Why? How are scientists better equipped to evaluate whether there is a deity or not relative to any other scientifically minded person? They aren't. But we do know a couple things. First...

But she is rich. Or at least her parents that were controlling her money are. Although I think she turned 18 and a lot of that money is hers now?

But only one provides the creative power for evolving. I suspect you meant to add more to this so that this sentence would be accurate. As it is this sentence is not true on its own and makes no sense in context. Every organism that is born or dies in a population changes the allele frequency...

That would depend on your definition of "scientifically minded". If you are simply talking about people that think "scientifically" because they are scientists, then you need to say so. If a more general definition is used - 'people that think logically and reasonably like the thinking required...

You're still being a bit cryptic. Are you saying that people that believe in life after the mind has separated from the body also believe, in this particular context, that there is "winning" after losing? Aha. Of course, if there is the most powerful being, understood as our benevolent creator...