Search results

Why would the sole masterbuilder, who boldly magnified his Christ-given office, NOT sign his name to a part of the foundation he was given by Christ to lay, when he signed everything else? I've never read a good answer to this question. There is no sensible reason Paul would have chosen to...

It is straight out of Exodus as the ceremonial washing of God's priest-nation. It is for and about messianic Israel and no one else.

Rome anathematized Paul's gospel at the council of Trent, but Catholics are only one example of those whom you said are saved by gospels other than Paul's. So I'm not the problem here. Bye.

If you teach anything in addition to the cross and resurrection of Christ for salvation, you are cursed by God Himself (Gal 1:8-9) because you have preached another gospel. If you are trusting a gospel that includes anything beyond believing Christ died for your sins and rose again for your...

https://vidmax.com/video/211032-little-french-soy-tyrant-macron-suddenly-shuts-down-4-million-vaccine-passports-3-months-early-to-force-people-to-boost This is why they can't be allowed to even start it. No end to it, ever.

Well that doesn't look shady at all.

bye

That's one of those questions that answers itself.

Homosexuality proves evolution doesn't exist, but that sin does.

You're still infected with a mutant strain of semi-universalism, just as I remembered.

Yep.

Someone can't be sealed unto the day of redemption and have that seal broken, unless God is a liar. Because that's what it would take for these people to be right--His seal would have to be broken, and Him lie about it. If you couple that with Hebrews 6, which they'd have to, once it's broken...

Part of the confusion here could be the people trying to blend in the general epistles with Paul's letters. Content-wise, they don't mix as Paul explains in Galatians 2. Plus, just look at who they are addressed to. 😐 Big part of their problem is that the general epistles have a yet-future...

Time to kick off the dust?

One more thing. People like "Tambora" usually insist that they know, or know of, people who were saved but chucked it and walked away forever. Never take seriously a word of their story if they can't prove to you what gospel their saved/lost person initially believed, which they can't. Plus...

There are people here who believe God really isn't very bright. Want to know how you can spot them? They believe He wasn't smart enough to consider the probability of those He forgave, quickened, and justified going through hard times with the world, the devil, and their own sin-infected...

The real Tambora was fearless but humble and honest ... never cherry picking, never evasive, and if she didn't understand something, she was willing to admit it. That isn't you. You are ignorant, arrogant, and lazy. Back on ignore with you.

One last time. According to the points you listed as your standard of the necessary content of saving faith, you accept Catholics (as just one example), who do agree with your points, as your fellow members in the Body of Christ. Yes or no?

Well well well.