Search results

I never made an argument that the flood was not global. I proclaimed that the flood was global, and still do.

Hi, Clete! I don't think he was being malicious by doing so. But while we are speculating and giving perspectives, I would have to say that common folks would understand it whether it was said with the precise grammatical structure or not. Especially when I had already said this: So when one...

They were not random, they fit within the topic of my thread. You could have just said "Amen".

And I never said you did say those things.

It's all relevant. Christ told the unbelieving Pharisees that is was a Gentile man and woman, Naaman & Sarepta, (and none of Israel) that were blessed because of their faith. God desires for all to come to Him. And He promised that Abraham would be the father of many nations, not just one...

Right, not that it wasn't global. Sorry my words are not technical enough for you to understand. If you want to take it that I am saying the Bible does not say the flood was global, be my guest.

The kingdom they all lived in was Rome, Israel didn't have a kingdom of their own. So how were those churches that included both Jews and Gentiles in the Roman kingdom established? Were they not churches that had faith Christ was the Savior of mankind or were they told that Christ was only the...

No indication that it was not global.

Yep, all nations will still exist and all are welcome. Do you speculate that all those Jews that heard the news at Pentecost went back to their homelands and only told Jews about that good news? I speculate that churches that included Jews and Gentiles were established in those regions even...

That's what I said. The story in scripture gives no indication it wasn't global.

The kingdom of Israel was supposed to be light to the whole world. The kingdom of Israel failed and was exiled and scattered throughout the world. It was only Christ that did not fail. Christ was the light to all nations, Jews and Gentiles alike. All are welcomed in His kingdom. The new...

Some say yes and some say no to the scientific evidence. But the story in scripture gives no indication it wasn't, so I leave the story as is.

Yes, it can be interesting conversation until it devolves into a bunch a wise cracks and put-downs about someone's speculation. Back to the topic of the thread, I speculate that the story scripture tells sure seems to indicate the flood was global.

No problem. Could be. I don't give much thought to how science thinks outer space operates because I don't think they have near enough data to be able to say for sure. But I see nothing wrong with speculating.

Don't know if it's "evil" or just a misunderstanding. He seems to be implying that unless BOTH consent to not having sex at any time then the one that wants to refrain must give in to the other. But that's not even practical. Should a man give in and leave work every time his wife is in the mood...

Woke culture censorship lives on.

Hmm. "Gratification" may be a key component of the argument. That one gets gratification and the other doesn't should be a concern to both. If it's about nothing more than physical gratification then a spouse is not needed for that, as one can physical gratify themself.

Not when they can gain a profit and connections off of it.

An immoral president and an immoral father. His son Hunter didn't fall far from the tree. No wonder daddy is proud of him.

6 minute video