Search results

It is the point. You cannot sustain the notion that the only reason Stephen sees the Son of Man standing at the right hand is to execute judgment rather than just being presented at the right hand. Daniel 7 (13) “I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one...

It's a discussion forum. It's obvious you do not want to discuss but just pound the podium. Toodles.

Or you don't. This is my gripe about MAD, they want to separate believers rather than unite them as God wants. MAD has to create 2 of everything in order for their narrative to hold water. MAD creates another gospel, another body of believers, another return of Jesus, another Gog/Magog...

No it wasn't. To make the argument that standing at the right hand has to mean judgment is about to executed simply cannot be sustained by scripture. Jesus can execute judgement whether He is sitting or standing. You are simply reading that into the verse to suit your narrative.

Doesn't make it not so either. It is very relevant. It was the Son of Man in Daniel 7 that is the one who receives dominion over all. The very Son of Man Stephen saw standing at the right hand of God who has dominion over all. Standing at the right hand in scripture doesn't inherently mean one...

It applies to believers. Believers are the body of Christ. The ones that would be hated were believers and they would be hated by were both Jews and Gentiles alike.

Or not. This kind of disrespectful slur will not get you invited to Christmas diner. ha! Stephen is referring to: Daniel 7 (13) “I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before...

Matthew 10 (22) and you will be hated by all for my name's sake. But the one who endures to the end will be saved.

He was rejected both before and after His death and resurrection. The stoning of Stephen showed their continued rejection, so I don't see why one would choose that one instance to be called their "official" rejection over all their other rejections such as killing Him, saying that they had no...

If Israel had embraced their Messiah then they wouldn't have plotted His death. He came as a servant in the flesh to die in the flesh, the sacrificial Lamb. And they rejected Him as a servant in the flesh. It was the plan all along that it happen that way, but no one was aware of it. 1...

Atta girl!

Yeah, that part can't be overlooked. He didn't come in the flesh to build an earthly kingdom to fight earthly oppressors. It wasn't the dispensation for that. He came in the flesh to die in the flesh.

Another 'conspiracy theory' turning out to be true.

Contradictory statements in scripture don't bother me because they are ancient statements at a time when vocabulary was much more limited than in modern times. Words were more flexible and less precise. So you have to take the statements made in light of the ancient limited vocabulary. We see...

**** UPDATE **** Elon Musk, owner of Twitter, removed all restrictions for the documentary and even posted it on his own account with his personal comment "Every parent should see this".

I've seen it. Great points made. The Daily Wire offered the entire documentary to Twitter to post for free for a limited time. At first Twitter was thrilled, but then caved in to wokeness and refused to air it or allow anyone to air it on Twitter. Ben Shapiro explains the free offer and the...

I know.

What's vague about it?

To prove to all the world that He was the faithful one and would keep His word from beginning to end to reconcile all back to Him.

Nothing in my post said they did. Nothing in my post said you did. Nothing in my post said they did. All nations get fixed by God. Nothing in my post says I said that. All needed the same Savior. Doesn't mean one cannot tell the difference between an Israeli, or a Greek, or an American...