Search results

LOL It is not "incorrect", and I am not "wrong", you're delusional. The "context" is Paul speaking of his fellow workers, whom he is including in his "greetings" to those whom he is writing. You can't possibly be that stupid. There is no transfer of context. He is naming his fellow workers...

The word "only" is in the context, in my Bible. Paul is speaking of his fellow workers, and Luke is excluded from those who are "only" of the circumcision. "Aristarchus my fellow prisoner greets you, with Mark the cousin of Barnabas (about whom you received instructions: if he comes to you...

Every book in the Bible is written FOR everyone (Christian or not), but not every word or book is written TO everyone.

(y) "For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells in bodily form" I went through this with you, and it's still the same. God cannot be separated from God. God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself. You cannot say that God was not in Christ when the world was being reconciled.

It's the same passage, in my Bible. And the word "only", in my Bible means "only".

"Aristarchus my fellow prisoner greets you, with Mark the cousin of Barnabas (about whom you received instructions: if he comes to you, welcome him), and Jesus who is called Justus. These are my only fellow workers for the kingdom of God who are of the circumcision; they have proved to be a...

You're not very bright are you? Because then you say... I said... "God communicated it perfectly, to those who care to know, and are willing to listen." Times past. In times present, "Do you know what salvation is, apart from reading the Bible? No, you don't." Why? Because God is not speaking...

God communicated it perfectly, to those who care to know, and are willing to listen. Do you know what salvation is, apart from reading the Bible? No, you don't. In fact, most words used in the Bible can only be defined by the Bible.

In the Bible. But, like many other words, you have to read the whole Bible to understand the definitions.

He was not a disciple of Jesus, and he was a Gentile. Paul, quite often, as I've already shown you, went to the Jew, disregarding his own words. "Then Paul and Barnabas grew bold and said, “It was necessary that the word of God should be spoken to you first; but since you reject it, and judge...

My definition is God's definition. God died on the cross, or no man is saved.

Apparently you know it wasn't Paul. Just as Luke did not walk with Jesus, but wrote his gospel from other accounts, based on what those who did shared with him, the same is true here, with Paul's direction and doctrine. Most of Acts is the same.

Not to the Gentiles, he doesn't, but he does to the Jews. "For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win the more; and to the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might win those who...

I have many people to correct. No, man did that. Just like man calls the four gospels "The New Covenant / Testament / Will", when we know that a covenant does not go into effect, until the one who makes it is dead. Paul's gospel is preached in the letter to the Hebrews. "But this Man, after...

I haven't stomped my feet, but I have given you solid evidence. You have ignored all of it, and acted like a child. Grow up. The letter to the Hebrews was written by Luke, accompanied by Paul. Peter said that Paul wrote to the Hebrews. Paul wrote to the Hebrews. Paul preached to Hebrews...

Completely irrelevant. Paul's other letters were to Gentiles. This letter was to Jews. You ignored these questions... Do you deny that Peter's letters are written to Jews (Hebrews)? Do you deny that Peter said that Paul wrote to Jews (Hebrews)? Do you deny that Paul spoke in the synagogues to...

I disagree Yes, he is, and he also spoke to and wrote to Hebrews. The Bible says so. "When Silas and Timothy had come from Macedonia, Paul was compelled by the Spirit, and testified to the Jews that Jesus is the Christ." Quoting God's word is not an "assumption", but rejecting His word is a...

How so? How so? Paul is comparing the priesthood under the Law, which is inferior, to the Priesthood of Christ. The writer of Hebrews is appealing to the Jews to abandon all that they had received under the Law, for Christ, who is far better. As you know, they have a different history, than...

Which doctrine is different?

As long as they have injected you, I'm satisfied.