... no reason to believe he would be a harm to other innocents.
:doh: he had just demonstrated a willingness to assault a police officer
... no reason to believe he would be a harm to other innocents.
I'm not a cop but I think I would shoot at him over the last thirteen on the list
but would I shoot him eight times over all of the last thirteen? I don't think so.
Also you didn't ask how many times I would shoot over heard and then around the ground at his feet and so forth...
if you shoot anywhere except center mass, you run the risk of stray bullets hitting non-involved citizens
and i wouldn't be surprised if slager's training involved emptying the whole clip if the decision to fire has been made
looks to me like slager made that decision while he was reaching for his sidearm, as scott was wrestling the taser away from him
:doh: he had just demonstrated a willingness to assault a police officer
ps Res, I think you are a teacher at heart so you are going to prolly know all about keeping control and holding your position.
Would you have shot him?
Sir, I do not fire.
But I might keep an eye out to find him later, or impound his car or, heck, tell his mom. Or all three.
If you will forgive me - the gun is not an extension of your male whatever it is, but I do believe it can feel like it.
the problem is that he's already demonstrated himself to be a risk to the public, by running and by assaulting an officer
if you let him go, what kind of a firestorm do you suppose would ensue if he injures an innocent?
No, I agree with you. But the situation was against the cop stopping him. The man was getting away, period.
I think he would not be able to solve the problem then - even if the guy did do harm after.
However, I repeat - there is always later.
Maybe the opportunity would avail itself to stop this guy getting away with such things?
But the Rodney King incident reminds me, can't go too far even later.
Gotta be wise and strong.
i've heard the cbc radio coverage of the beating in california - haven't looked for it online yet - surprised nobody posted about it yet
i've got a monster final coming up in a few weeks and should have my head into that and not this
Keep chasing. Call for back-up. :idunno:then i'll ask you what i asked purex
and i'll emphasize that slager had already deployed and lost control of his non-lethal response system
Resisting arrest isn't the same as being a thread to anyone else.:doh: he had just demonstrated a willingness to assault a police officer
We still need more info on the particulars but most Tasers from what I gather still operate as contact stun guns after the dart shooting part has been discharged.Keep chasing. Call for back-up. :idunno:
But running away with your Taser opens a whole list of problems. Police forces aren't exactly in the business of handing those things out. If he goes on to hurt another officer or anyone else it's on that cops head.Resisting arrest isn't the same as being a thread to anyone else.
We still need more info on the particulars but most Tasers from what I gather still operate as contact stun guns after the dart shooting part has been discharged.
So, chasing a guy that has your stun gun? What do you do when you catch him? Besides get stunned.
But running away with your Taser opens a whole list of problems. Police forces aren't exactly in the business of handing those things out. If he goes on to hurt another officer or anyone else it's on that cops head.
So to prevent him from possibly tasing another officer you shoot him. I don't buy it.
So to prevent him from possibly tasing another officer you shoot him. I don't buy it.
Keep chasing.
Call for back-up. :idunno:
Resisting arrest isn't the same as being a [threat] to anyone else.