No one here has shuttered by the mention of these things.That is in part a big reason why some women shudder by the mention of these things and launch into attack mode because they have grown so used to an idea that they are simply entitled to such an allowance that they simply do not want to acknowledge the real reality of it.
No one here has shuttered by the mention of these things.
That's just more of your fantasy.
No one here has denied that some men (as well as women) have gotten a raw deal in court.
That's just more of your fantasy also.
Who needs to acknowledge reality now?
:think:
Oh, YOU!!!
Well then, buddy, TOL is not a feminized society.
GD and I are both women, and we criticize each others opinion on certain matters.
Bybee and I are both women, and we criticize each others opinion on certain matters.
Rusha and I are both women, and we criticize each others opinion on certain matters.
Angel and I are both women, and we criticize each others opinion on certain matters.
And what's more, I'm still good friends with them all.
The "elephant" you see here is only in your imagination.
Maybe there really is that elephant somewhere, but not here.
Now now ... quit confusing him with the facts. It's a conspiracy perpetrated by women!
No one here has shuttered by the mention of these things.
That's just more of your fantasy.
No one here has denied that some men (as well as women) have gotten a raw deal in court.
That's just more of your fantasy also.
Who needs to acknowledge reality now?
:think:
Oh, YOU!!!
Your dishonesty shows right in your post. You try to hide the issue by saying that 'men and women get a raw deal at court'.
Domestic courts have a gigantic bias that is well known to be in favor of women. It is also a statistical and observed fact that in court systems across the board, women are shown more leniency than women.
So.. reality- don't use that word anymore. You simply refuse to make an account of the problem.
IF it's so well know, you won't have a problem providing a link.
Seriously, it's not like anyone should just take your word for it.
You get mocked for your opinion.I can and I do and what is the response I get from you gals?
Since when?I'm not allowed to have the opinion that stripping is immoral.
Well, I'll be darn.I'm accused of being sick and evil,
I've never said you defend rapists.of defending the rapists
You have done that.while blaming the victims.
Dialogue gets shut down by closing a thread.All a pack of lies to shut down the dialogue. Therefore, discussions are NOT ALLOWED to take place.
That's bull.Not a one of you will admit that strippers are doing anything wrong....anything deserving of any consequences, whatsoever.
If the Lord so allows it, it was deserved?What you refuse to admit is that there are some situations where women (like all people everywhere) DO deserve to suffer for their bad behavior....even including rape and death if the Lord so allows.
That's just bull.* discussion and dialogue are not allowed here
Agreed.
The statistics may very well reveal a wisdom from the judges in putting babies with their mothers who breastfeed them and look after them in infancy. Primary care-giver bonding is no laughing matter.
Men can literally breastfeed, and if they have done so, then they can get as much consideration in matters of custody.
As the child ages it still matters who did all that breastfeeding and babysitting. That parent did the heaviest bonding. That child feels the bond. As long as the primary care giver is being responsible it's obvious what the child needs.
That's bull.
That's just bull.
You are still giving your opinion, right here, right now in this thread!!!
Then God allowed it.I think it is here, Tam.
Maybe TOL is not the place for them, if they react to opposing opinions by keeping silent.In fact, I know for a fact it's right here and alive and well. It has torn apart friendships and it's sidelined some very godly men who have found it unprofitable to even voice their opinion because of the backlash.
Well, talk about being "emotionally invested".Oops, all those words and not a thing that comes close to having a dialogue or a discussion.
Giving opinions isn't the same as having a dialogue or a discussion. If I give my opinion and you tell me I'm wrong without addressing any of the points I've made, then it's not a discussion. As I've said....discussions are not allowed to take place on these topics. Dialogue is shut down before it can even begin.
Smart aleck remarks may be very entertaining and they may allow you to let off some steam, but it closes down all dialogue quite effectively. I can certainly play that game, and I have, but there will never be a discussion taking place as long as you insist on being so emotionally invested....as long as you insist on attacking the messenger. You don't like what's said so you dog pile the one who said it. You've been here long enough to recognize what's going on, but you're in the dog pile, so you must not see what you've been doing.
And, you just succeeded in making me sorry I ever tried to engage you in a conversation. You're exactly like Rusha and Bybee when they get on their high horse. This exact same attitude of yours has been ongoing since the very first rape thread that was posted. I could hardly believe it was you. Yes, Tam, you are coming down on the side of women's libbers on this topic. If you deny it, then you're only fooling yourself. It's why you get high fives from RUSHA. Think about it.
Agreed.
The statistics may very well reveal a wisdom from the judges in putting babies with their mothers who breastfeed them and look after them in infancy. Primary care-giver bonding is no laughing matter.
Men can literally breastfeed, and if they have done so, then they can get as much consideration in matters of custody.
Then God allowed it.
Accept it as your consequence.
Maybe TOL is not the place for them, if they react to opposing opinions by keeping silent.
Opposing opinions is what keeps TOL active.
On a side note, I have heard some say that YOU are the reason they keep silent about some things.
Did you "shut them down" and "not allow them to voice their opinion"?
Or was it their own choice to do so?
You just keep looking more foolish.Your dishonesty shows right in your post. You try to hide the issue by saying that 'men and women get a raw deal at court'.
Domestic courts have a gigantic bias that is well known to be in favor of women. It is also a statistical and observed fact that in court systems across the board, women are shown more leniency than women.
So.. reality- don't use that word anymore. You simply refuse to make an account of the problem.
:rotfl:
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
I'm slowly realizing that there's more people than I thought who simply just don't know jack about domestic issues and the status therein.
:rotfl:
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
I'm slowly realizing that you few don't know jack about domestic issues.
Well, talk about being "emotionally invested".