:rotfl:You mock and laugh at men's issues when they are brought up.
It's more like you love men who just accept the problems they receive due to women and feministic bias.
It's downright funny how paranoid he is of women!
:rotfl:You mock and laugh at men's issues when they are brought up.
It's more like you love men who just accept the problems they receive due to women and feministic bias.
You mock and laugh at men's issues when they are brought up.
It's more like you love men who don't standup for men-kind.
Don't confuse the little man with facts.While you were participating on this forum in December busy provoking women in rape threads, I started a thread on male rights issues. It was mostly ignored and mocked by men. Rusha was third top poster in that thread, and she was obviously supportive of men's rights. You and the other misogynists had nothing to say when given the chance.
While you were participating on this forum in December busy provoking women in rape threads, I started a thread on male rights issues. It was mostly ignored and mocked by men. Rusha was third top poster in that thread, and she was obviously supportive of men's rights. You and the other misogynists had nothing to say when given the chance.
Of course I am completely on board with men's rights. That does not negate the fact that men and women DO have certain rights denied as as well as abusive treatment in certain situations.
I will always support a father over a mother in the case of a woman wishing to abort her unborn child VS a father willing to love and raise that unborn child.
I think bolcats was 1pms or her husband eloyhims account but they allowed dolo to use it to back each other up in debates.
Easy to see if you read some exchanges in this thread:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110096&page=38
While you were participating on this forum in December busy provoking women in rape threads, I started a thread on male rights issues. Rusha was third top poster in that thread, and she was obviously supportive of men's rights. You and the other misogynists had nothing to say when given the chance.
Neither my wife nor I have mentioned you or interacted with you, yet here you are starting crap. Pay attention:
:rotfl:The "women" were doing the provoking in those rape threads
The "women" were doing the provoking in those rape threads.....and your threads are filled with so much sexual stuff I'm not surprised Rusha ran over there to participate. :chuckle:
I didn't make a claim about grace and salvation. You just couldn't understand my point.
The example I provided in the OP had nothing to do with sex. Trad immediately started discussing rape, and as soon as you showed up you started in with the strippers again. Now you are making slimy sexual innuendos about Rusha.
:rotfl:
Yes you did....you implied we deserve both grace and salvation.
The example I provided in the OP had nothing to do with sex. Trad immediately started discussing rape, and as soon as you showed up you started in with the strippers again. Now you are making slimy sexual innuendos about Rusha.
The dictionary definition of deserve all its synonyms imply a sense of justice.
You claim you are using a definition of deserve that does not imply justness. Using your definition: Do you deserve God's grace?
By reading the Bible or however you ended up believing the gospel, didn't you earn salvation by your actions, thus deserving it according to your alleged definition?
While you were participating on this forum in December busy provoking women in rape threads, I started a thread on male rights issues. Rusha was third top poster in that thread, and she was obviously supportive of men's rights. You and the other misogynists had nothing to say when given the chance.
It was more than amusing.Yeah, I found it pretty amusing myself. :thumb:
The "women" were doing the provoking in those rape threads.....and your threads are filled with so much sexual stuff I'm not surprised Rusha ran over there to participate. :chuckle:
It was more than amusing.
It was downright silly!!!!