Crow said:BTW, there's been a change in the mode of submission. I'm going to post a link to PM submissions to, just in case anyone might be tempted to "borrow" from someone else's work. When submissions close, we'll post them so that everyone can read them.
Lovejoy said:I agree with Shimei, go for it. The worst that can happen in that they disagree with you. At that point, though, your point will already be communicated. At the very least, the contest should have an entry or three that are dissenting opinions, you know?
Crow said:BTW, there's been a change in the mode of submission. I'm going to post a link to PM submissions to, just in case anyone might be tempted to "borrow" from someone else's work. When submissions close, we'll post them so that everyone can read them.
Crow said:We got it. The link in the OP is correct.
Crow said::shut:
I got it. I'm about to distribute it.Chileice said:I sent mine in in three parts. It looks like it went to turbo. Do you know if it was all received? Do you get a copy too, Crow?
Good for you! I am trying to pull one together, but it is so difficult to do in-between my real projects. Hopefully...Chileice said:Well... I did it. I went ahead and sent one in.
Crow said:Last chance. Get your entries in if you want to them to be considered.
Chileice said:It's a nice gesture, but I am quite sure that no matter how I would argue from scripture, the panel of judges would probably reject me out of hand, knowing that I oppose the death penalty. But... I might give it a shot anyway.
Husband&Father said:First of all this is not a death penalty case. The fact that YOU bring up the death penalty when it has nothing to do with the subject at hand shows that you have a chip on your shoulder when it comes to that subject.
But since you brought it up, rejection of the death penalty is rejection of scripture. However, that fight is for a different thread.
This case is a matter of defining self defense by biblical standards then attempting to discern whether or not the standards were adhered to.