ECT Write a few lines summarizing these chapters

[Interplanner]

When all other arguements fail, use character assassination. --STP

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

You said the lie was that it was citing Isaiah. What's wrong with that? It is the major source reading in this variation and the quote ends in Isaiah.


If that's a lie, no wonder you think 2P2P makes sense.

Mark 1:2 (NIV)

is still a lie.

Why do you defend a lie?

Hath God said?

 

[Interplanner]

Mark 1:2 (NIV)

is still a lie.

Why do you defend a lie?

Hath God said?

You are nothing if not unclear. What lie?

Your stock just plummets every time you open your mouth my friend, but keep trying.

 

[Interplanner]

And...how are the summaries of these chapters by Tam, STP, RD, Must, GM coming along? Ought to be a cake a piece.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

You are nothing if not unclear.

The irony...

 

[Interplanner]

The irony...

Do you think you have 'explained' the lie by saying 'what prophets'? I was expecting a paragraph in answer to 'what is the lie?' Instead you said 'what prophets?' It doesn't have anything do with anything.

 

[Interplanner]

It would help 100x on your clarity to go ahead and do what the OP here is. Write a few lines about each of those chapters. None of the 'apostles' of 2P2P are willing to do that, but they want to believe they are 'clear.' I think that is because they think 2P2P is clarity.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

It would help 100x on your clarity to go ahead and do what the OP here is. Write a few lines about each of those chapters. None of the 'apostles' of 2P2P are willing to do that, but they want to believe they are 'clear.' I think that is because they think 2P2P is clarity.

Huh?
85% of what you post is indecipherable.

 

[Interplanner]

Huh?
85% of what you post is indecipherable.

WRITE A SUMMARY LINE OR TWO ABOUT EACH OF THOSE CHAPTERS.


What is so confusing about that? Mr Huh Huh? When I was a kid, I was taught that to say 'huh' was the height of coming across as stupid in a conversation.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

WRITE A SUMMARY LINE OR TWO ABOUT EACH OF THOSE CHAPTERS.


What is so confusing about that? Mr Huh Huh? When I was a kid, I was taught that to say 'huh' was the height of coming across as stupid in a conversation.

Huh?

 

[Interplanner]

Why can't you write summary lines about those chapters?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Why can't you write summary lines about those chapters?

What's a summary?

 

[Interplanner]

What's a summary?

This is the tactic of 2P2P. When they get trapped about the NT, they redefine it. When they get trapped about a summary, they redefine it. Like when secular humanists get trapped about gender, they...

 

[Right Divider]

This is the tactic of 2P2P. When they get trapped about the NT, they redefine it. When they get trapped about a summary, they redefine it. Like when secular humanists get trapped about gender, they...

Oh, that is rich!

 

[Interplanner]

Oh, that is rich!

Yes, you are. I think you want to add Malachi, right?

So let's just call it the apostles' accounts of Christ and letters. THE RESULT WOULD BE THE SAME. 2P2P is still your fraud you love.

 

[Right Divider]

Yes, you are. I think you want to add Malachi, right?

Nope, don't know where you got that.

So let's just call it the apostles' accounts of Christ and letters. THE RESULT WOULD BE THE SAME. 2P2P is still your fraud you love.

What a lunatic you are! Seek some professional help.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

This is the tactic of 2P2P. When they get trapped about the NT, they redefine it. When they get trapped about a summary, they redefine it. Like when secular humanists get trapped about gender, they...

Huh?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

What a lunatic you are! Seek some professional help.

Marcus Lamont Sanford has a case of wicked unbelief, which will make a man insane if he tries to study the Bible in unbelief.

 

[Danoh]

Marcus Lamont Sanford has a case of wicked unbelief, which will make a man insane if he tries to study the Bible in unbelief.

Lol - why Lamont - the know it all, narrow minded, super biased one on that still great tv classic was his dad; Fred - Lamont was ever open to reason.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Lol - why Lamont - the know it all, narrow minded, super biased one on that still great tv classic was his dad; Fred - Lamont was ever open to reason.

I associate IP with Lamont because Fred called him, "you big dummy"