Maybe so, but I'm not speaking to your particular experience, but the rule and why it's a bad idea for seventy percent of the people who feel like, going in, it's the right call.
Would you say that those 70% are the kind of people that let God pick for them and pray and study before and during the picking, and take their responsibilities as a sacred charge afterwards? If not, then all you have is that more youngsters are hard hearted and foolish enough to select their own mate without God.
If you wanted to make a law to limit divorce, then instead of focusing on age, you should make a law that both partners have their own income and spending power, dropping the divorce rate down to 20% right off the top. Because divorce prevention laws should focus on the real problem, which is tension over money in marriages with the hard-hearted.
The same thing I've noted from the beginning, the biological and also (for most) the experiential limitations.
It doesn't make sense to say that about marriages like mine and it's unsupported by the Bible. What ways do you imagine young marriage has hobbled the successful marriage, since the biology of the partners is one that spans a lifetime (ever-changing) and experientially, they can have whatever experiences together that they choose during that lifetime.
Well, no. It's not typically months of courting and counselling. But I'm glad you went through that. As with your outcome, it's exceptional.
How is that even possible? All adults have to go through that if they want to marry in state and under the authority of the church they belong to. Our pastor had to feel he knew us and approved of us before marriage, even though it was an out-of-state wedding we had.
It isn't about intelligence at all and nothing you can quote me actually writing does anything of the sort... It's about thinking with the wrong part of the brain because the part that's meant to do the reasoning for you is under repair. It's about a biological impairment and a want of life experience. And however you want to frame me, it doesn't alter the objective fact of what happens, seven times out of ten, when someone under that mark marries.
I believe that God's child can get a mate, chosen by God for him at whatever age God is willing to deliver one and it will work as long as both have the hearts promised to them by God.
Godly people don't divorce. God helps older teens (like He did for me) do the thinking when it's time to marry and older people who won't submit to God's help are more doomed than the teen who picks with God's help.
Whatever the reason and there are many, from sex to finances to a want of maturity the end result remains for most, tragic. And so, for most, it's a bad idea.
Those listed reasons, if someone divorces over them, is because they have a hard heart. This advice you give helps
them reduce their divorce rates.
In fact, they'd be better off (if a lonely life of no divorce is better) just trying to be happy not needing their spouses and children. The single life is the easiest for those who are hard-hearted.
Sorry, but you're just wrong. Biology makes it less likely that you'll be using the part of the brain that's designed by God for good judgment and more likely to heavily rely on the impulse control deficient part of the brain that is embroiled in the more purely emotional response to experience.
Biologically speaking, the most fertile time is the one you are passing up in favor of a more pruned prefrontal cortex. God didn't say wait until the prefrontal cortex is pruned for marriage, and the reproductive aspect of us contradicts that idea as well.
People nearly always don't marry on impulse. They fall in love on impulse. Even older people fall in love like that. Then reason kicks in. It takes a long time to find out what the other person is thinking, to nurture the connection, and finally implement that first impression, and all that time can be spent thinking of the gravity of the idea.
If you were thirsty, I could hold out on you for a while and claim you didn't really need a drink of water. At least at first. The lips start cracking. I tell you it's because you are deficient in magnesium. Your tongue swells. I tell you it's because you are low in B-vits, but eventually, when you start getting deranged from dehydration, people are gonna start arguing that you are acting a little thirsty.
While I could not go on denying you have a need for water more than a day or two, you cannot go on denying you have a need for a companion for more than a decade or two before people start saying the loneliness is taking it's toll.
Either that or maybe you should consider whether you believe that God said man needed a companion to combat loneliness (this was after establishing for our education that pets wouldn't fix it) and so made him someone he needed.
It seems that way to you because you stopped growing in that way before you could encompass it.
Back to the immaturity claim. Poor me, all stunted.
![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:]()
I don't need you or any other internet strangers for validation. I have what I need already, thank you.
Part of what she liked about me from the beginning was that I was happy. I made her laugh. Or, as she put it, she liked what she saw, but she loved what she heard.
![Smile :) :)]()
So what I'd be likely to say is that she has made me happier. I wouldn't want to have my life without her. It would be lessened by her absence.
So you do need her to make your life complete as God said you would. Of course you were happy before.
I was happy, too.
I can be happy when I'm starving. I can be happy when I'm in pain. I can even be a happy person when I'm lonely. But that doesn't mean I can't also cry when I'm alone and thinking about possibly living my whole life alone. And I did that when I was not invited over to be with other people after church, and I would wander around on campus counting my blessings and trying to not think about how everyone else seemed not to be passed over and invisible on what was supposed to be a happy day. I was just too small, invisible and boring to be of interest at those selective social gatherings. But they sure found many ways to use me as a volunteer when it was time to evangelize.
So yeah, I was happy, but I was suffering. It made me sad, too, when I would think about it. But I wasn't a miserable cloud, I was a smiling, mostly happy person, who was seriously thinking about the possibility of lifelong celibacy.
Or Jack what? You said your husband made you happy. Okay, you started in the hole, to the extent it caused you physical troubles, but then you had kids together. Your kids didn't make you even happier?
It's like the Biblical Hannah. When it's time for needing to have kids, it's not happy times to not have them. Anymore than singlehood is particularly a happy time, in and of itself. As a mom, my happiness is completed by the joy of children. My purpose is in them. Not in having a career to impress the world with.
You tell them that? You tell them, "I was happy before you were born"? But you said you were. Then you were happier still after they came. That's life telling you what I was and you not considering it enough to find the point.
They know I felt I needed them before we even tried to conceive. They know we both wanted a lot of kids. We tell them we needed them. We would not have been able to remain happy without moving on in life to the parenthood stage. It's like ignoring any other essential, God given imperative. There are consequences to not playing along.
Supra. Though by now you should be willing to retract what you obviously experienced yourself.
Or, to encapsulate, I was happy, had a good life before I ever set eyes on my wife. I was happy with my wife for years before Jack announced himself. Both added to my happiness and gave me the opportunity to return the favor.
You would not have remained happy if you had continued on without them. Imagine yourself as a single old man with no kids and no romance. Do you think God ever implied Adam could have been happy without a wife and kids?
Never marry a person from need. That's something in you that you need to deal with. Marry from love, which is a desire to give. It's an abundance, not a need.
I guess God was pretty crazy, making woman for a need. And Adam, for going along with it...
I did marry for love. I also clearly needed a companion to complete me. I told God I would never marry unless He brought me the man and the perfect man for me at that. I got all I asked for and even more than I knew to ask for.
I need to deal with the fact that I feel completed and happy with the purpose of my life? I'm addicted to my husband, is that it? Do we fix that with separation and self-discovery? :doh:
Or do we just leave alone what isn't broke?
You do sound young. It might be because you still are or because that's how you patterned when you truncated the learning curve. My wife's mother married young like you and I notice that in some ways she seems much younger than her years.
Or perhaps it's the Asperger's syndrome you are picking up on. People tried to discourage my husband from marrying me and even told him to annul weeks after - over traits related, not to immaturity but to my Asperger's - which is incurable. I would have been celibate to this day (still too immature!!) if I was measured by their standards.
Or you are just trying to cut me down because of my unconventional perspective. :idunno:
I thought you were a friendly for a bit there, now I'm not so sure.
....
Be back later to finish...