She's likely spouting hot air. It happens from time to time
You really have no idea what you are talking about ... because this is history and you were not here to witness it.
She's likely spouting hot air. It happens from time to time
I haven't communicated with him in weeks. Surely he wouldn't remember something I never said, something you can't even quote.
Bottom line (again): You have no evidence for your false accusations, liar.
Do you at least agree he was using a principle of statistics? :sigh:
I haven't communicated with him in weeks. Surely he wouldn't remember something I never said, something you can't even quote.
Bottom line (again): You have no evidence for your false accusations, liar.
What is it with you and others blaming their bad behavior on other posters?
Angel does not have the power to give you or anyone else infractions.
She did not ban Voltaire. Or Dolo. Nor is she responsible for his newest username that he signed back in under.
Nor did she make umpteen threads calling people out by name for the sole purpose of ranting. You are not being a friend when you endorse these types of tactics.
How did you get that idea, seriously?
I understand how injecting such an idea is an attempt to poison the well, but I read the paragraph so you'll have to carefully explain to me how it does more than that.
Think of me as a male friend and explain it sincerely. Thank you in advance.
Of course you have. On the Quick Links under the "whose online" you were have a private conversation with Bolcat. He IS Dolo/Voltaire. You know this, so your above statement was intentionally false and misleading.
Of course you have. On the Quick Links under the "whose online" you were have a private conversation with Bolcat. He IS Dolo/Voltaire. You know this, so your above statement was intentionally false and misleading.
You really have no idea what you are talking about ... because this is history and you were not here to witness it.
The 'mother up' comment in context should have been more than clear frankly as others have pointed out. I think you're being obtuse if you to try and make out anything other from his remarks.
Who is voltair posting as now? I don't know. He can email me personally and hasn't told me that he is back under any user name. Spit it out.
He doesn't sin, remember?
That's actually a fair point. I made a judgement based on my prior experiences with her.
:chuckle: You pretend as though you have some authority over such matters. I have reported it, btw.
I think on the topic and thread I am speaking of, you would have agreed with both Angel and I and everyone else who wishes to protect teenage girls from being pushed/forced into marriage with older men.
If that's an accurate representation of the discussion...
How does "mother up" mean marry young, and how did you determine how young from that term "mother up?" Your answer didn't help me, man.
Yes, but applying that to men/women/sex is sheer nutball thinking frankly.
If you honestly think that young blokes aren't going to have sex with a willing young woman for the majority then you're at odds with the reality that's actually going on.
You are conceding that you do sin. See 1 John 3:6-10.
In brief, we have person who claims to be Christian yet still claims to sin, and claims that an eleven-year-old rape victim should be able to abort her child, and teams up with an unbeliever to bear false witness against me. Note they have not provided any evidence for their false accusations against me.
Oh c'mon, I really shouldn't have to walk you through this man. Yorzhik's position is that society should encourage "well raised" girls to 'mother up' during their youth instead of 'partying'. Do the math.