You aren't even a good liar.
| Tranny run over by a truck | |
Sure, the ending is a good laugh, but how they act is the problem. That is what faggots like you want.
Why Left-Handedness Must Be Criminalized
- Thread starter The Horn
- Start date
You aren't even a good liar.
Sure, the ending is a good laugh, but how they act is the problem. That is what faggots like you want.
way 2 go
Well-known member
Tolerance
now:
a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward opinions, beliefs, and practices that differ from one's own.
then:
the disposition to be patient and fair toward those whose opinions
and practices differ from one's own
kiwimacahau
Well-known member
If believing in equal rights for Gays makes you a Gay then loving WW2 aircraft, as I do, makes me a Messerschmidt me-109. Idiocy!
Actually, believe it or not, but this is the first good argument I have heard in favour of homosexuality: I'm left-handed, therefore homosexuality is great.
It's a lot more convincing than the other argument.
We can, so long as you keep it to yourself and not demand us to receive it, find another florist, bakery, photographer and venue for your perversion, and ill be just fine.
Its not hard to take your business where its wanted and not demand i approve of your lifestyle in order to work.
kiwimacahau
Well-known member
Once you open your doors in a business, you no longer have the right to pick and choose your clientele.
Not quite as good as: I'm right-handed, therefore homosexuality is an abomination.
lain:
alwight
New member
Actually it never mentioned homosexuality it was entirely about left-handedness.
But now you have mentioned it there does seem to be a remarkable parallel here. :idea:
Left-handedness just is a fact of life, some people just are left handed, to which the rest of us simply accept these days as something that need not be "corrected", it just is.
Now if the same kind of thinking could be applied to homosexuality imo the sooner discrimination and homophobic bigotry will end.:think:
Actually it never mentioned homosexuality it was entirely about left-handedness.
But now you have mentioned it there does seem to be a remarkable parallel here. :idea:
Left-handedness just is a fact of life, some people just are left handed, to which the rest of us simply accept these days as something that need not be "corrected", it just is.
Now if the same kind of thinking could be applied to homosexuality imo the sooner discrimination and homophobic bigotry will end.:think:
Thanks for clarifying what the other argument is: left-handedness is something that has been recorded (i.e. it has been noted as a fact); homosexuality is something recorded. Therefore left-handedness and homosexuality are the same and should be treated the same.
Also, thanks for your 'assuming the conclusion' and argument by minority (I mean, it isn't even argument by majority!) ("which the rest of us simply accept these days as something that need not be "corrected", ")
as well as special pleading ("Now if the same kind of thinking could be applied to homosexuality "), neither of which are of course valid arguments.
You also forgot the subject of this thread which is why left-handedness should be criminalised. Very few Christians hold this view and ACW is the only one I know who does. So it is rather a straw man to begin with don't you think?
Actually it never mentioned homosexuality it was entirely about left-handedness.
But now you have mentioned it there does seem to be a remarkable parallel here. :idea:
Left-handedness just is a fact of life, some people just are left handed, to which the rest of us simply accept these days as something that need not be "corrected", it just is.
Now if the same kind of thinking could be applied to homosexuality imo the sooner discrimination and homophobic bigotry will end.:think:
There ought not be discrimination before the law.
But finding something distasteful is not bigotry.
alwight
New member
That's fair enough and I wasn't saying others have to like it or be involved in something they don't like, just be tolerant. I personally have no wish to be particularly involved in any gay lifestyle but if they do then good luck to them.
Sure you do, make it a membership only business and problem solved.
Wait, i thought you wanted to be left alone? Isn't that a 2 way street?
Its not like we are seeking you out.
I don't think anybody assumes you are a homosexual, but I know for a fact you are a pervert.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Actually it never mentioned homosexuality it was entirely about left-handedness.
But now you have mentioned it there does seem to be a remarkable parallel here. :idea:
Left-handedness just is a fact of life, some people just are left handed, to which the rest of us simply accept these days as something that need not be "corrected", it just is.
Now if the same kind of thinking could be applied to homosexuality imo the sooner discrimination and homophobic bigotry will end.:think:
So you don't see any difference? I'll be blunt. I don't believe you. Not for one minute. Which hand a person uses has nothing to do with right or wrong. It's perfectly natural to be left-handed though not common. It is not perfectly natural to have sex with a person with the same "equipment" you have. A left handed person can pitch a ball....the hand works as was intended to. Can't say the same about same sex stuff.
alwight
New member
Perhaps you will explain to an old unbeliever like me why I should conclude that right or wrong is anything to do with which gender happens to be sexually appealing?
If you check the word "sinister" concerns the left side.
adjective
1. threatening or portending evil, harm, or trouble; ominous:
a sinister remark.
2. bad, evil, base, or wicked; fell:
his sinister purposes.
3. unfortunate; disastrous; unfavorable:
a sinister accident.
4. of or on the left side; left.
5. Heraldry. noting the side of an escutcheon or achievement of arms that is to the left of the bearer (opposed to dexter ).
In the past left-handedness was thought to be associated with evil and the devil, so left handed children were made to be right handed.
This of course was a ridiculous and religious presumption just as persecuting of those who just happen to be gay often is today, notwithstanding those who just are homophobic without any religious prompting of course.
According to gay people themselves it was no choice which sex attracts them innately, despite any perceived mechanical mismatch.
Last edited:
We want to leave you alone in your uncleanness.
But you target Christian book sellers and make them serve you with the works of darkness, you target Christian guesthouses and force them to make provision for your vile sins .
You target Christian adoption agencies to make them procure children...you even target Christian bakers.
glassjester
Well-known member
Implicitly, yes.
Handedness can be changed. Ambidexterity can be learned. This is well-known.
Each moment that a left-handed person chooses not to work on their right-handedness, they do, implicitly, choose to continue to be left-handed.
This is a good parallel.
glassjester
Well-known member
Why do they not choose to become right-handed then?
Because their is no moral or practical reason compelling them to do so.
If there was a morally or practically compelling reason to be right-handed, then the difficulty (even if it was impossible!) of making the switch would not serve as a reason against doing so, would it?
People make difficult moral choices all the time. In fact, almost without exception, a moral action is more difficult to perform than an immoral one.
Because their is no moral or practical reason compelling them to do so.
If there was a morally or practically compelling reason to be right-handed, then the difficulty (even if it was impossible!) of making the switch would not serve as a reason against doing so, would it?
People make difficult moral choices all the time. In fact, almost without exception, a moral action is more difficult to perform than an immoral one.