2 Pe 3:16 :reals:
Mt 19:9, KJV
"34.78 ἀφίημιe; χωρίζωb; ἀπολύωd; λύσις, εως f: to dissolve the marriage bond—‘to divorce, to separate.’ ἀφίημιe: ἄνδρα γυναῖκα μὴ ἀφιέναι … μὴ ἀφιέτω τὸν ἄνδρα ‘a husband must not divorce his wife … and a wife must not divorce her husband’ 1 Cor 7:11, 13." Louw, J. P., & Nida, E. A. (1996). Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament: based on semantic domains (electronic ed. of the 2nd edition., Vol. 1, p. 456). New York: United Bible Societies.
Nominal source. Try Zodhiates. Then you might understand the historical fallacy you have embraced to judge others in your own unrighteousness.
Typological of Christ and the law. Too bad you're not dead to your law husband. Now you commit adultery trying to being joined to Christ.
The remainder of the context is Roman verbal divorce without a writ.
Yes, your worldly wisdom is foolish.
Yeah, a verbally discharged spouse must have a writ or they are in adultery, even if they're innocent. No spouse can merely be put away. There must be a writ.
And this cannot even be applicable today. A writ is required by man's statutory law, even for common law states.
Right. So you shouldn't be blown by all those winds and waves of false doctrine, reprobate.
Have you put away/divorced :freak: your wife? :Shimei: Eccl 10:2, Jn 10:10
NO. But those who have been divorced and remarried don't need your false doctrine and self-righteous condemnation.
Mote-eyed accuser of the Brethren.
No. He's a moronic novice and needs to step down and be taught.