Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I must have missed that link Art. I'll gladly review it, and after doing so will ask if this person (being one of many victims who survived the brutality of homosexual Adolf Hitler) had knowledge of the sexual activities of those in the SS.
Given that you miss more than anyone else here it's hardly surprising, but do feel free to refute such testimony that has the actual SS as the perpetrators of such insidious suffering with your "expert" knowledge an' all...
Forgive me for not paying closer attention to your posts Art, but often times my mind wanders thinking about what you would say to a group of convicts in prison when they asked you...
"Is it true that you told two young children that homosexuality is ok as long as the people involved love each other?"
Quote:
I keep asking the homosexualists who post in this thread where these supposed rights to infect others with incurable deadly diseases, molest the minds and bodies of children and change invaluable societal institutions come from Art.
Perhaps you could answer those questions for the followers of this 3 part thread?
You keep asking a group of an imaginary set of people a load of questions? Who'd have thought it? I've yet to see anyone support the 'right' of another to infect someone with a disease, curable or not. I've yet to see anyone support child molestation in any shape or form and as to the rest - move to Saudi Arabia or Uganda. I'm sure they'd love to have you...
You're correct Art, there is no human or civil "right" to engage in buggery.
On that note: I'll post an excerpt of Bryan Fischer's article talking about the historians that acknowledged that Adolf Hitler and his SS were a bunch of brutal homosexual thugs (posted in Part 1 of the thread as well).
June 2, 2010
Throckmorton, history, and gays in the military
Bryan Fischer
Dr. Warren Throckmorton posted a column on his blog on Crosswalk.com yesterday which attacked me by name, and accused me of "vilifying" every homosexual everywhere by making historically accurate references to the role of homosexuality in Adolph Hitler's life and the rise of the Nazi Party. Apparently in Dr. Throckmorton believes that telling the truth, if it happens to be the truth about a politically-correct group he happens to favor, is sub-Christian.
I, of course, never said that all homosexuals are brutal and savage, and yet this is what Dr. Throckmorton accuses me of saying when he says that I "vilified an entire group of people." If he would like people to stop vilifying others, well, here's an opportunity for him to show us the way.
How Dr. Throckmorton feels about Christ vilifying the Pharisees by calling them a "brood of vipers" and sons "of your father the devil" he does not say. Perhaps if telling the unpleasant truth about folks is against the standard of Christ, he should first take the matter up with Christ rather than with me.
Throckmorton says that my assessment of Hitler's sexual preference is not based on "eyewitness" testimony. Yet German historian Lothar Machtan cites extensive documentation of Hitler's own homosexuality, including military records, memoirs of soldiers who served with Hitler, and police records from the early 1920s. If this kind of evidence is not sufficient for Throckmorton, one can only wonder what kind of evidence would be.
[Don't feel badly Bryan, it's not good enough evidence for TOL homosexualist Art Brain either].
As far as the role of homosexuals in the rise of the Nazi Party, historians for decades — before homosexuality became such a touchy topic — were quite matter-of-fact about the truth that Hitler recruited and used homosexual thugs.
Here, for instance, are several excerpts from William Shirer's classic work, "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich."
"But the brown-shirted S.A...many of its top leaders, beginning with its chief, Roehm, were notorious homosexual perverts." (p. 120)
"He, who was so monumentally intolerant by his very nature, was strangely tolerant of one human condition — a man's morals. No other party in Germany came near to attracting so many shady characters. As we have seen, a conglomeration of pimps, murderers, homosexuals, alcoholics and blackmailers flocked to the party as if to a natural haven. Hitler did not care as long as they were useful to him." (pp. 121-122)
"...[T]here was a demand...that the criminals and especially the perverts be expelled from the movement. This Hitler frankly refused to do." (p. 122)
"The Munich S.A. had become notorious for the homosexual habits of Lieutenant Edmund Heines and his friends..." (p. 122)
Here is historian Louis Snyder:
"What was needed, Roehm believed, was a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in his eyes, were not as adept in such behavior as practicing homosexuals."
Here is historian Thomas Fuchs:
"The principle function of this army-like organization was beating up anyone who opposed the Nazis, and Hitler believed this was a job best undertaken by homosexuals."
Historian H.R. Knickerbocker:
"Roehm, as the head of 2,500,000 Storm Troops had surrounded himself with a staff of perverts. His chiefs, men of rank of Gruppenfuhrer or Obergruppenfuhrer, commanding units of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual he had no chance of advancement."
Machtan writes credibly that Roehm was murdered in 1933 not because Hitler was offended by his homosexuality but because Roehm knew of Hitler's sexual proclivities and threatened to expose him publicly.
The Nazis also trashed and burned the Sex Research Institute, headed by the effeminate homosexual Max Hirschfeld, again not because of its link to homosexuality but because the institute contained so many damning files on the sexual inclinations of leaders in the Nazi Party.
For instance, Ludwig L. Lenz was the assistant director of the institute, and explained why the institute was the "first victim which fell to the new regime."
"The answer to this is simple...We knew too much...
Read more:
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/100602
So many historians: so much refuting for you to do Art.