musterion
Well-known member
Is that inherently a bad thing?
It is when He damns them for rejecting Blood that He never shed for them. But that's been pointed out to you many times and you just ignore it.
Is that inherently a bad thing?
Jacob's people painted lamb's blood on the lintel and then on one doorpost and then the other making the sign of a cross.
I can't make the connection between the sign of the cross and the lamb's blood painted on the lintel. What do you have in mind?
Touch a lintel then touch one door post and then touch the other door post.
Okay, I did it. Now, what does this message have to do with the People of Jacob aka Israel?
Frankly, I do not see anything wrong with that.
God chooses some and not others for lot of things. Is he wrong for doing that?
If any are sinless and damned then I might agree. Otherwise, not so much.
Much of what the Israelites experienced pointed to Jesus Christ, but you are to blind to see it.
Absolutely not! Jesus was an Israelite, part of the Son of God which is Israel. (Exodus 4:22,23) It is only obvious that Jesus experienced some of the vexations the Jews have experienced. Now, you don't need for that matter to prove freedom to replace the People with the individual.