Their sins are not becoming a part of the Republican Party platform. See the difference?There's more than just one. Many more. Ever heard of the Franklin Scandal? Do you know who Jeff Gannon is?
Their sins are not becoming a part of the Republican Party platform. See the difference?There's more than just one. Many more. Ever heard of the Franklin Scandal? Do you know who Jeff Gannon is?
Yes, I see the difference. The Democrats are more honest about where they stand on the issues whereas the Republicans are lying phonies.Their sins are not becoming a part of the Republican Party platform. See the difference?
Your party being honest about being pro-pedophila is not something to brag about, UN.Yes, I see the difference. The Democrats are more honest about where they stand on the issues whereas the Republicans are lying phonies.
1. I'm not a Democrat so it isn't my party.Your party being honest about being pro-pedophila is not something to brag about, UN.
You sure do spend a lot of time defending them.1. I'm not a Democrat so it isn't my party.
You actually think they're being dishonest when they criticize Florida's anti-groomer bill?2. Quote for me where they have been "honest about being pro-pedophilia," as you put it.
Quotes or it didn't happen.
I do. I'd spend more time defending the Republicans if they weren't so busy defending the indefensible.You sure do spend a lot of time defending them.
You're dodging. Give me quotes that confirm your claim that Democrats have been "honest about being pro-pedophilia," as you put it. Direct verbatim quotes or it didn't happen.You actually think they're being dishonest when they criticize Florida's anti-groomer bill?
It was your claim, not mine. I'm simply agreeing with you when you said in post #22, "The Democrats are more honest about where they stand on the issues." When the Groomer party opposes Florida's anti-grooming bill, I agree with you that they are being honest about where they stand on that issue.Give me quotes that confirm your claim that Democrats have been "honest about being pro-pedophilia," as you put it. Direct verbatim quotes or it didn't happen.
You said that the Democratic Party "adopted pedophilia as a part of its platform," here in this post:It was your claim, not mine.
All I'm asking you to do is to prove your claim. Quote from the platform of the Democratic Party where they say that they have done that.There's a big difference between having some members of your party being pedophiles and your party itself adopting pedophilia as part of its platform.
In post #16 I said, "The Groomer Party is getting there at breakneck speed." I'm 100% right about that.You said that the Democratic Party "adopted pedophilia as a part of its platform," here in this post:
All I'm asking you to do is to prove your claim. Quote from the platform of the Democratic Party where they say that they have done that.
Maybe he’s used to right-wingers making up these outlandish lies and not getting pushback when they post them at Rumble or wherever, where no proof is needed. Or wanted.You said that the Democratic Party "adopted pedophilia as a part of its platform," here in this post:
All I'm asking you to do is to prove your claim. Quote from the platform of the Democratic Party where they say that they have done that.
Another dodge, as expected.In post #16 I said, "The Groomer Party is getting there at breakneck speed." I'm 100% right about that.
He bought into Y2K and QAnon among other obviously fraudulent conspiracies, so this is par for the course for him I'm afraid. Some people just go through life being immune to evidence as a matter of course.Maybe he’s used to right-wingers making up these outlandish lies and not getting pushback when they post them at Rumble or wherever, where no proof is needed. Or wanted.
Matt Gaetz is not just any Republican--he's a MAGA Republican. He supports Trump and he enjoys Trump's support in return. And, he appears to be a groomer. Where is Q when you really need him? Nowhere to be found.One Republican congressman compared to the entire Groomer Party seating a pro-pedophila SCOTUS Justice. Are you sure you want to get in this ring?
It looks like Q might be getting ready to post on Trump's Truth Social. Every username is required to have a minimum of 3 characters. However, the very first member to sign up (before the gates were opened up for the public) was granted an exception. That member only has 1 character in their username: Q.Where is Q when you really need him? Nowhere to be found.
I'm sure you're looking forward to him telling you more lies that your itching ears long to hear, to feed your strong delusion.It looks like Q might be getting ready to post on Trump's Truth Social. Every username is required to have a minimum of 3 characters. However, the very first member to sign up (before the gates were opened up for the public) was granted an exception. That member only has 1 character in their username: Q.
I'm capable of skewering both the left and the right, but I'm also capable of moving to the left or to the right depending on the situation. But generally speaking, I think it's fair to say that the safest place to be is somewhere near the middle. The nearest approximation to truth can usually be found somewhere in the middle ground between two extremes.Yikes !
I'm sure glad I'm in the middle, and not on the right or the left.
I don't really think that is a good way to measure/locate the truth.I'm capable of skewing both the left and the right, but I'm also capable of moving to the left or to the right depending on the situation. But generally speaking, I think it's fair to say that the safest place to be is somewhere near the middle. The nearest approximation to truth can usually be found somewhere between two extremes.
I was talking about politics, not crime.I don't really think that is a good way to measure/locate the truth.
Is there a middle-ground for abortion?
Murder?
Theft?
I'ld say "No".
Surely politics and law, and morality are related. Inextricably.I was talking about politics, not crime.