Taken for the Conservative Review
https://www.conservativereview.com/
https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
It seems Ted Cruz has the best conservative record. Scott Walker has a more mixed review, and while Mike Huckabee does well on moral issues, he seems to lack the political savvy to attract fiscal conservative votes?
Rand Paul is the other extreme, he is too much leaning on the fiscal side, and not really a social conservative/ same with Carly Fiorina, yet I think we may need a vice president candidate who is female to beat the democrat who will have fence sitters vote for Hillary because she is a women. Also Carly Fiorina does well on 2nd amendment issues, as well as carry a long fiscal conservatives, where Cruz may be perceived less focused, as well, although to a less extent, Walker.
I also think well of Marco Rubio, and see his point on immigration as one inevitable, if only he would find himself in agreement, by immigration, we need productive citizens, not welfare bums,, so please be selective! I worry about him giving free handouts, he has gone into an anti-poverity spin. At least he wants the states to have control on the money!
Bobby Jindal may not be so loved in Louisiana, yet he shows support for what may benefit America, as well, Trump would also know, and as well Carly Fiorina/ yet it seems unlikely he will be nomonated/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...ial-candidates-all-16-of-them/article/2558790
I also think, have we to face Hillary with Carly Fiorina, it would be least likely, she would voice for Cruz.
Jeb Bush is not George Bush, however, the bush name will not escape the George Bush/ Iraq fiasco, which made sense to a few oil tycoons, but not the general populace, who felt used.
Are any in the pink? here is all i know on that:
http://time.com/3656219/2016-candidates-gay-marriage/
now conservative are they. More than Nixon, as much as Barry Goldwater?
http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/...w-conservative-2016-gop-hopefuls-actually-are
BTW: Bernie Sanders is a pinko socialisteach:
https://www.conservativereview.com/
https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
It seems Ted Cruz has the best conservative record. Scott Walker has a more mixed review, and while Mike Huckabee does well on moral issues, he seems to lack the political savvy to attract fiscal conservative votes?
Rand Paul is the other extreme, he is too much leaning on the fiscal side, and not really a social conservative/ same with Carly Fiorina, yet I think we may need a vice president candidate who is female to beat the democrat who will have fence sitters vote for Hillary because she is a women. Also Carly Fiorina does well on 2nd amendment issues, as well as carry a long fiscal conservatives, where Cruz may be perceived less focused, as well, although to a less extent, Walker.
I also think well of Marco Rubio, and see his point on immigration as one inevitable, if only he would find himself in agreement, by immigration, we need productive citizens, not welfare bums,, so please be selective! I worry about him giving free handouts, he has gone into an anti-poverity spin. At least he wants the states to have control on the money!
Bobby Jindal may not be so loved in Louisiana, yet he shows support for what may benefit America, as well, Trump would also know, and as well Carly Fiorina/ yet it seems unlikely he will be nomonated/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...ial-candidates-all-16-of-them/article/2558790
I also think, have we to face Hillary with Carly Fiorina, it would be least likely, she would voice for Cruz.
Jeb Bush is not George Bush, however, the bush name will not escape the George Bush/ Iraq fiasco, which made sense to a few oil tycoons, but not the general populace, who felt used.
Are any in the pink? here is all i know on that:
http://time.com/3656219/2016-candidates-gay-marriage/
now conservative are they. More than Nixon, as much as Barry Goldwater?
http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/...w-conservative-2016-gop-hopefuls-actually-are
BTW: Bernie Sanders is a pinko socialisteach: