Sooooooo Rocketman, have you come to your senses and quit defending Donald Trump?
Where Will All That Anger Go When Trump Is Dismissed?
- Thread starter PureX
- Start date
ClimateSanity
New member
If he can quit making offensive gestures toward women, he might have a chance. TOL is a microcosm of America. Stir up the feminist wasp nest on TOL and you will never hear the end of it. American women are not taking his comments on the looks of various women too well. Throw in his three trophy wives whom he left once the looks left and you get a population of women who not only won't vote for him but viscerally hate him. That is his Achilles heel, not Muslims or Mexicans or rally violence.
Womanizing Presidents are always welcome and loved in America - see JFK, Clinton, even FDR
That's like asking a snake not to bite (misogynists hate women, Donald Trump is a misogynist).
Donald Trump is flawed in so many areas: his stance on wanting the US to be neutral between Israel and Palestine (i.e. Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood) shows how phony he is on his stance on Islam.
Violence: I pointed out that in his interview with Playboy Magazine that he gave accolades to the Chinese Communists for the way they handled the protestors in Tiananmen Square (once a thug always a thug).
Spoiler
The mainstream media is playing softball with Trump now because they so desperately want him to be the Republican nominee to ensure a Hilary Clinton victory. If he should get the nomination, all of his past will be revealed.
Interesting. There are also plenty of baptized people who hate patriarchy, but there are virtually no atheists who don't hate patriarchy.
Ditto. Well, no. I like your opinion. I don't always agree, but I like it. I can get facts anywhere, but I can only get your opinion from you.
If Romney couldn't beat President Obama four years ago, then Cruz isn't going to beat Clinton this year. At least let's watch some amazing debates between the professional rhetorician Trump and the presumed first lady President of the United States. Make her earn her stripes. Cruz is not the obstacle course we have in mind for her. We were a bit concerned at her handling of Benghazi. Let's see how she handles an unapologetically patriarchical bulldog, because some of the world's other heads of state are exactly that. She's going to have to not wilt. I just don't think Cruz can bring that kind of heat.
Yup.
ClimateSanity
New member
Define hate. Do Donalds statements qualify as hate? How many women does he hate? How many men? Is it equal????
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Many godless Libertarians are supporting Donald Trump.
Libertarians for Trump
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/03/...tarians-trump/
I have no idea what you're talking about (baptism, patriarchy, atheism?).
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I'm more interested in the facts than your opinion.
My opinion is based on the facts: Take for instance this post that I started on Donald Trump entitled "The Donald Trump Files".
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...-Recriminalized!-Part-4&p=4595610#post4595610
I look at all of the facts about Donald Trump and because of those facts, have an opinion that he is a fraud who would make a terrible President.
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Which "game" is that?
There you go comparing RINO/Establishment wonder boy Mitt Romney with conservative/anti Establishment leader Ted Cruz.
It sounds as if you'd rather watch a soap opera instead of having 2 candidates with opposite political ideology debating one another (Trump and Clinton are one in the same).
Senator Ted Cruz is a world class debater. You should check out the awards he received while on the Harvard Debate Team.
Cruz would debate Clinton on the facts; the misogynist Trump would use personal insults to try and defeat her.
You do realize that Donald Trump isn't a very intelligent man don't you?
Many godless Libertarians are supporting Donald Trump.
Libertarians for Trump
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/03/...tarians-trump/
I have no idea what you're talking about (baptism, patriarchy, atheism?).
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I'm more interested in the facts than your opinion.
My opinion is based on the facts: Take for instance this post that I started on Donald Trump entitled "The Donald Trump Files".
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...-Recriminalized!-Part-4&p=4595610#post4595610
I look at all of the facts about Donald Trump and because of those facts, have an opinion that he is a fraud who would make a terrible President.
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Which "game" is that?
There you go comparing RINO/Establishment wonder boy Mitt Romney with conservative/anti Establishment leader Ted Cruz.
It sounds as if you'd rather watch a soap opera instead of having 2 candidates with opposite political ideology debating one another (Trump and Clinton are one in the same).
Senator Ted Cruz is a world class debater. You should check out the awards he received while on the Harvard Debate Team.
Cruz would debate Clinton on the facts; the misogynist Trump would use personal insults to try and defeat her.
You do realize that Donald Trump isn't a very intelligent man don't you?
Trump is a political genius
Would you agree that people who do interviews for pornographic magazines have no respect for women?
All the anger will go to buying more guns and ammo and settling in for Hitlery as president
ClimateSanity
New member
People who look at porn and produce porn have no respect for women. If i do an interview for GQ, it doesn't mean I admire metrosexuals. If i do an interview for mother Jones magazine, it doesn't mean I am a Bernie Sanders voter.
Agreed.
Trump’s history of flippant misogyny
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1f1bec-3de4-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html
ClimateSanity
New member
Agreed.
Trump’s history of flippant misogyny
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1f1bec-3de4-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html
A misogynist in feminist terms is a person who deals with women in a way that women do not like who are not actually involved with said misogynist.
A true misogynist would have an actual victim who was harmed in a tangible way. Who was harmed by the interview?
glorydaz
Well-known member
Agreed.
Trump’s history of flippant misogyny
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1f1bec-3de4-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html
Twenty-six years ago.
Agreed.
Trump’s history of flippant misogyny
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1f1bec-3de4-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html
Well as long as Trump supports and approves of pornography, it must be acceptable.
lain:
glorydaz
Well-known member
Well as long as Trump supports and approves of pornography, it must be acceptable.
Oh, like supporting and approving of strippers. :chuckle:
I wasn't using (and couldn't care less about) "feminist terms".
This definition has Donald Trump written all over it.
noun
1.
hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women, or prejudice against women.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/misogyny
There have been volumes written about the harm that pornography brings to women and children.
8 months ago:
Trump’s history of flippant misogyny
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1f1bec-3de4-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html
Old (woman hating) habits die hard.
ClimateSanity
New member
Donald didn't produce any porn. Again, what tangible harm did Donald do to anyone with that interview? I'm aware that many women hate Donald but calling someone fat doesn't qualify as hatred for all women.
ClimateSanity
New member
How does she draw the conclusion that I think porn is acceptable because I don't think his interview with a porn magazine is an indication he hates women?