So I am still waiting to hear whether scientists know what bats descended from.
Or is it possible that the ancestor of the bats was bats that were created on the same day as all the other creatures that fly?
Me too. That entire blisteringly stupid post from a "science lover" that is nothing more than biblical mysticism for example.
This is a theology forum, brainiac. This thread itself is in the "Religion" catagory. Bob's post explaining some Biblical Hebrew words pertaining to the topic was interesting, and fits in just fine here.
(sorry bob, I shouldn't spur him on...)
Don't be silly.
Everybody knows that bats are what vampires turn into.
Now, the real question is: Where do vampires come from?
But the thread was about a scientific matter- the possible ancestors of bats.
Yes, molecular biology seems to indicate a difference between the microchiroptera and the macrochioptera.
The problem is that they have very fragile bones, and live where fossilization is very unlikely. Consequently, we have little data from the fossil record to support other data.
It's still an open question.
So I am still waiting to hear whether scientists know what bats descended from.
Or is it possible that the ancestor of the bats was bats that were created on the same day as all the other creatures that fly?
Or is it possible that the ancestor of the bats was bats that were created on the same day as all the other creatures that fly?
This is a theology forum, brainiac. This thread itself is in the "Religion" catagory. Bob's post explaining some Biblical Hebrew words pertaining to the topic was interesting, and fits in just fine here.
(sorry bob, I shouldn't spur him on...)
It's a circular thing. Vampire bats come from vampires, vampires come from vampire bats. The chicken and egg dilemma.
So where do you guys think bats came from?