Cruciform
New member
Only if your question had, in fact, already been answered.i WOULD ask Cruc who he is voting for but he would probably just say already answered.
Only if your question had, in fact, already been answered.i WOULD ask Cruc who he is voting for but he would probably just say already answered.
Only if your question had, in fact, already been answered.
So far, there isn't a single candidate on whom I would waste my vote. Fortunately, we have a few months to go yet. We'll see what transpires in the meantime.it hasn't but you might (as some of these jokers here often claim) say it anyway.
So far, there isn't a single candidate on whom I would waste my vote. Fortunately, we have a few months to go yet. We'll see what transpires in the meantime.
Since it's inherently irrational, I'll ignore your insult, and simply say "No thank you."what a disappointment... :sigh: I foolishly (as it turns out) thought that.. since you are smart enough to study Catholicism... and smart enough to convert once you see the truth of it.. you would be smart enough to endorse Ted Cruz...or Walker.
Since it's inherently irrational, I'll ignore your insult, and simply say "No thank you."
Yes. Personal insults are inherently irrational, since they neither prove your opinion nor disprove mine.I am disappointed once again. There is absolutely nothing irrational about my post... maybe it was a little facetious, but not much...irrational?
Yes. Personal insults are inherently irrational, since they neither prove your opinion nor disprove mine.
No need, since we have your own posted statements, like those in Post #24 above:oh, now I insulted someone that's odd... I had no intention of insulting anyone, didn't think I was...hmmmm...well... guess you know me better than I know myself.
Does Choice trump LIFE?
__
No need, since we have your own posted statements, like those in Post #24 above:
"I foolishly (as it turns out) thought that.. since you are smart enough to study Catholicism... and smart enough to convert once you see the truth of it.. you would be smart enough to endorse Ted Cruz..."
Basically, your statement is that I am not "smart enough" to agree with your political preference, a claim which I find as insulting as it is irrational.
Campaign slogan?
Speaking of which...what's his views regarding abortion?
Don't know much about him other than his media created persona, which rather lends itself to reality TV than reality Oval Office.
Another direct insult.however, you forget one thing. reading comprehension deficit, I guess...
Not in the initial post containing the original ad hominem insult (#24).I used the word FACETIOUS