He is incredibly dumb.
It was the poor and unlearned that accepted Jesus as their savior. All of the prominent well educated Pharisees went to hell. You have a bitter Spirit.
Caino is not "poor and unlearned" and does not accept Jesus as his savior (the real one, he has a made up one).
Irrelevant to our discussion
No, I don't Mr. Judgmental.
Everyone is of infinite value to God simply because Jesus shed his blood for everyone. Therefore, everyone should be treated with dignity and respect.
Respect is earned and Caino has used up any and all of the respect that he once "deserved". Caino is 100% heretic and you should know that by now, but apparently you do not. Caino spits on the sacrifice of Christ that could save him, but instead he rejects it. Caino also rejects the apostle that God chose to deliver His message of grace to the world. That you defend Caino is clueless of you.
How could the twelve "preach the Gospel" when they did NOT know what is was yet?
Scripture says that Jesus appeared to Paul.
Scripture says many conflicting things like punishing Israel for killing Jesus......... when it also implies that was Gods "plan" all along from the beginning.
Please demonstrate FROM SCRIPTURE your supposed argument for this.
Please define, clearly and unabiguously, this "original gospel" from SCRIPTURE.
Nonsense. the only errors are typos and such. No improvements can be had from your space aliens.
Much of Paul's epistles are revelation from God. When it's Paul's opinion, he says so.
Some people hear space aliens talking to them... but that doesn't make it so.
The only confused one between me and you is YOU!
19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
The original gospel was largely lost, forgotten, overwritten by the excitement of the resurrection an preaching of the speedy return of Jesus which they assumed was imminent. The old or original "good news" was God as Father of each individual, not just a national God of Israel. It was salvation by faith (not just works) and forgiveness by receiving it and in turn forgiving others. The profitable religious institution of Judaism didn't like Jesus' simple appeal and they sure didn't like the idea that Gentiles were their brothers, that they were to share God the Father with ALL people of the earth!
Paul wasn't God nor were his words the Word of God, equal to Jesus. That's a Christian "claim" or belief.
Cherry-picking is no way to understand scripture.
Jesus was BOTH murdered and self-sacrificed.
They did not "seal their doom" permanently. Jesus will return to be their (the remnant of believing Israelites) King on the earth, where Israel will be the head of the nations. Note what Jesus said about them:
And Peter:
There was nothing "outside of Judaism" there. God gave Israel a set of rules and a future if they obey. God has not given up on them forever, that is just something that people like you make up.
You look at only one side of the story. Their restoration is also guaranteed by God.
Christ told them that He would return before they had gone to all of the cities in Israel.
SCRIPTURE... show the SCRIPTURE... I don't care about your FAIRY TALE telling.
More assertions without evidence on your part. FAIRY TALES is all that you tell.
Paul told the truth; you lie.
Your "god" cannot create a "bible".
Jesus revealed things to Paul that Paul recorded in the Bible. You vomit fairy tales.
Your whole story is a fairy tale that simply is not true and opposes the truth.
If Jesus wanted Paul to be an apostle he would have chosen him while on the earth. I don’t believe that Jesus returned for a quick trip to meet with Paul to give him a new Gospel.Cherry-picking is no way to understand scripture.
Jesus was BOTH murdered and self-sacrificed.
They did not "seal their doom" permanently. Jesus will return to be their (the remnant of believing Israelites) King on the earth, where Israel will be the head of the nations. Note what Jesus said about them:
And Peter:
There was nothing "outside of Judaism" there. God gave Israel a set of rules and a future if they obey. God has not given up on them forever, that is just something that people like you make up.
You look at only one side of the story. Their restoration is also guaranteed by God.
Christ told them that He would return before they had gone to all of the cities in Israel.
SCRIPTURE... show the SCRIPTURE... I don't care about your FAIRY TALE telling.
More assertions without evidence on your part. FAIRY TALES is all that you tell.
Paul told the truth; you lie.
Your "god" cannot create a "bible".
Jesus revealed things to Paul that Paul recorded in the Bible. You vomit fairy tales.
Your whole story is a fairy tale that simply is not true and opposes the truth.
He wouldn't pick someone to teach a different, compromised Gospel for the sake of pleasing pre-existing religious ideology in the Greco-Roman world. But hey, I believe Paul's conversion was real, many people have had them, but that doesn't mean that every thought, word and letter he spoke going forward was the "Word of God".
Explaining that the speculation and conjecture about the meaning of the death on the cross isn't criticism of God, it's criticism of the men who made such conclusions into a new Gospel after Jesus left. Jesus warned us about false prophets. They meant well and Jesus did foster the church as the only thing he had to work with but just because men become religious doesn't mean they are perfect.
I know what both of those terms mean, Jesus never used them nor taught them. Those ideas come from the human EGO that finds it difficult to receive a gift without feeling he must do something equal in return to square up the account.
Because Jesus had already taught the Gospel to the apostles that they were to go out into the world and teach. He never said he was coming back to teach Saul somewhere in Arabia a new Gospel.
So his followers say.
Yes I do, you have too much pride to accept Gods Love and forgiveness so you have to concoct a substitute. The atonment is an assult upon Gods own free will.
As far as you are concerned to forgive as Jesus taught it is to "un-judge them" and let the ultimate Judge be their Judge. "Judge not that you be not Judged".
Again, for us forgiveness means to "un-judge". If we have not first judged people then forgiving them instant an issue. We are not competent judges of men's souls. Even Jesus took this position "And I do not judge you, for there is one who judges for me."
Neither one of you understand "The Historical Gospel of Jesus Christ". The Gospel calls all things into question, especially religion, which is a work of the law. Any religious thing that we do is a work of the law, Paul said, "By the works of the law (what we do) no flesh will be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin" Romans 3:20. Many think that they are justified by their religion. There is nothing, absolutely nothing that we can do to please God. God only accepts the works and the person of Jesus Christ, we are accepted only in him and because of him. In the judgment the only ones that are going to be saved are those that are "In Christ". To be "In Christ" means that you are trusting in his righteousness and in his atonement for your sins, plus nothing.
There are MANY gospels in the Bible. GOSPEL simply means GOOD NEWS.
Jesus taught Israel (the eleven with one replacement to be added later) to keep the law of Moses.
You mean the one that you will not define? What about Mark 1:1? Why do you ignore this verse?
There are MANY gospels in the Bible and you do NOT understand what they are or how they relate to one another.