modalistic Monarchians:chuckle:
Wrong. Please re-read post.
modalistic Monarchians:chuckle:
Heb 1:3 is about the spirit Christ and Jesus. Jesus the human came years after the creation. Col 1 speaks of Christ as firstborn of all creatures. Consider Christ as the express image of the Father. Christ became flesh in Jesus at his anointing.
Do we all understand here that there is a difference between the function of the Holy Spirit and the Holy Ghost? It's not worded two different words for nothing.
RBBI -With all due respect this represents a horrible lack of understanding of basic Greek. In Greek, the word is the same - pneuma....
Nope - Modalistic Monarchianism is a joke. It does not seem that you are aware of basic early church history.
We will live eternity in earthen vessels RBBI, and yelling for the majority to wake up is your own personal nightmare, NOT reality.
Those who KNOW our triune God and Savior, ARE indeed AWAKE.
RBBI
You seem like you have a sincere and gentle heart.
My best in your walk in Christ.
Sincerely,
Aner
You sure about that?
Aren't you? What do you think ETERNAL LIFE IS?
Hey Stan - Did you get that Acts 10:38 text which substantiates that Jesus was anointed at His baptism?? I think we can safely move on now that we have established that. Thanks to KeyPurr for providing that text.
Aner
Keypurr is on my ignore list if you paid attention to my posts, and Acts 10:38 doesn't say what you purport it to. Try reading it IN context.
Then Peter began to speak: “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favouritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right. You know the message God sent to the people of Israel, announcing the good news of peace through Jesus Christ, who is Lord of all. You know what has happened throughout the province of Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John preached—how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and power, and how he went around doing good and healing all who were under the power of the devil, because God was with him.
You assume God did this anointing when Jesus was baptised by John, when in fact Jesus was anointed from birth. Again, read Luke 2 and what Simeon prophesied and confiemd, and also what the angels said in verse 11;
Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord.
Sorry about missing your Ignore for KeyPurr - I admittedly don't keep up on all the relational drama around here.
As to context, the only item that is relevant is that time of the anointing which occurred subsequent to John's beginning to preach his message. Regardless of providing a clear time of the anointing which the context does, the statement is totally sufficient within itself if one has a basic understanding of the concept of "an anointing" for an office (obviously the office of the Messiah). You are simply hung up on a text which you are misreading in the context to the whole of scripture (I have done the same in the past so it is quite obvious when someone else is doing so). This text totally clears up what is really obvious to any basic Bible reading even without this text.
With all due respect, I suspect your method in this instance is sourced from the same location that results in your having a hard time with such clear texts that describe Jesus as a man and God as the Father alone.
I have done my best and you are choosing to simply do what you want. Good luck, Aner.
Just stating the obvious.
It's pretty simple really, for anyone who is NOT inculcated.
Can Jesus function independently of the spirit Christ? If the spirit Christ dis-incarnated - or was never incarnated - could Jesus fully function just like you and I?
Hey Stan - Did you get that Acts 10:38 text which substantiates that Jesus was anointed at His baptism?? I think we can safely move on now that we have established that. Thanks to KeyPurr for providing that text.
Aner
Your welcome my friend, I have posted this verse many times but most can not see what is in it.
Does that (in your mind) convince you of the fact, you're
a scholar and a genius? Perhaps, you ought to motivate
yourself to write a book on the subject? Maybe it would
become a best seller? One never knows? Give it a shot.
I'll wait until it ends up in the bargain bin and purchase
it on paperback. If I mail it to you, would you autograph
it? I'll send it to you, "postage paid."
Just stating the obvious.
and nowhere does the scriptures say Jesus was "anointed" at the water baptism. Do you think God couldn't think of the word when he inspired this account? The reason for Jesus' water baptism was made clear by Himself. That all righteousness be fulfilled. Matt 3:15
Maybe you can show us where the OFFICE of the Messiah is taught IN scripture? Quite frankly I'm not the one HUNG UP on this issue.
Your condescending nature is typical of keypurr and his ilk but not something that bothers me at all. I'm used to unis being like you.
Your words have already indicated you have NO respect for me so don't bother trying to play nice. Jesus was a man, a man that was/is God incarnate. I'd supply many scriptures but my experience with people of your ilk is that you are blind to them.
I am choosing to RIGHTLY divide the word of truth and you are choosing to deny the deity of Jesus, despite many scriptures that show the contrary. It is obvious you cannot or will not accept what hypostasis is.
It's pretty simple really, for anyone who is NOT inculcated.
Stan
I believe it is appropriate to address your observation of my condescending attitude and my lack of respect for you first. I have a strong sense of a spirit of arrogance from you - and that spirit tends to rankle me which tends to manifest in my wording (though I don't think I tried to "play nice"...). Admittedly, this may not be my best trait.