Do you think it would be good to go around killing saved people, to send them to Heaven?
Saved people do not need my or anyone else help, in any way. The saved are the few who found the straight gate and narrow way that leadeth onto eternal life and heaven. They are also the chosen few:
Matthew: 7 King James Version (KJV)
14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
It is the billions of Abraham's other generation who need help. And it is the chosen few who are saved that can help them. The billions of Abraham's other generation are the many who are called, misled by false prophets, do not know scriptures, err and are not saved. They are sad bunch. If their physical bodies were aborted when they were unborn children, they would be far ahead of their sad state
This is based on the Catholic canon which says that all people who die (any why way) as unborn children (before they have a chance to commit sin) goes to heaven. Look at the alternative:
Matthew: 22 King James Version (KJV)
14 For many are called, but few are chosen.
Matthew: 24 King James Version (KJV)
11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
Mark: 12 KJV N.T.
24 And Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?
What is your understanding of 'to be saved'? Clearly we do not share the same definition of 'to be saved'.
This is why I asked, What do you perceive to be the meaning of 'to be saved'?
Unborn children are neither yet save nor delivered to heaven. However Catholic canon says that unsaved people who die (any which way) as unborn children go to heaven. Clearly, according to Catholicism, this is a fail-safe short cut to heaven and salvation. The alternative (to not being aborted as an unborn child) is almost certain delivery to hell.
Why would Catholics be anti-abortion, unless of course, they are all bent on derailing their peers and charges from going to heaven so as to send them to hell.
I would not get into aborting unborn children, so as to deliver them to heaven, because I am not a Catholic. I do not see wisdom in the Catholic canon which says: 'all people who die (any why way) as unborn children go to heaven'.
You are free to confirm/quote the revelation in the Holy KJV N.T. that support that canon. I know of none. If you do, I would know and show the merits of abortions.
You guys are the ones who say that unsaved people who die (any which way) as unborn children go to heaven. This is not about me. It is about you guys, pushing contradicting ideologies and believing that you are smart with foolishness.
Please show me that you all are not making up your own things with arrogance while simultaneously accusing Paul of making up things. You guys sound tricky.
Remember it was no less than Jesus who identified Peter to be Satan because Peter advised Jesus to save His physical life and deny and derail His proposed rise to heaven. This is the same thing that is happening with the Catholic anti-abortion stance:
Matthew: 16 KJV N.T.
21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
Please wake up and smell the aroma of truth, before too late is your cry.
What I say or do is not consequential. However the Holy KJV N.T. is totally consequential.
Last edited: