The main merit of the ideas you propose is their source- so what do you expect?Darwinists love it when the argument is over where an idea comes from rather than its actual merits.
The main merit of the ideas you propose is their source- so what do you expect?Darwinists love it when the argument is over where an idea comes from rather than its actual merits.
Isn't that what the Origen of Species is - a religious text?When you depend on a religious text for facts- you are talking about religious belief, not science.
Then leave. There are many forums online which heavily restrict name-calling. This one hasn't. Why did you come to this one?I've rather had it with being labelled 'weak minded' or even a 'moron' as an acceptable form of argument on this site.
A rational response. Silence would do it.What do you expect?
The main merit of the ideas you propose is their source- so what do you expect?
I've been on this forum for many years. Once upon a time, it was mostly polite and there were interesting discussions. It's turned into a self-congratulatory pub for people with extreme views, and a place to post absurd ideas.Then leave. There are many forums online which heavily restrict name-calling. This one hasn't. Why did you come to this one?
From the get-go, you weren’t polite. Go back and read your very first post.I've been on this forum for many years. Once upon a time, it was mostly polite and there were interesting discussions. It's turned into a self-congratulatory pub for people with extreme views, and a place to post absurd ideas.
In short- I am likely to leave soon. Then you guys can enjoy wallowing in the mud and patting each other on the back.
I've been on this forum for many years. Once upon a time, it was mostly polite and there were interesting discussions. It's turned into a self-congratulatory pub for people with extreme views, and a place to post absurd ideas.
In short- I am likely to leave soon. Then you guys can enjoy wallowing in the mud and patting each other on the back.
Remember, he's firmly in the party of "2+2 = whatever we need it to equal at the moment."You are simply confused.
Facts are facts, no matter where they come from.
I've been on this forum for many years. Once upon a time, it was mostly polite and there were interesting discussions.
Including people who think nothing exploded to create everything, fish turned into people, babies aren't people and joebiden won the election.It's turned into a self-congratulatory pub for people with extreme views, and a place to post absurd ideas.
Don't let the door hit you in the butt on your way out.In short- I am likely to leave soon. Then you guys can enjoy wallowing in the mud and patting each other on the back.
Then stop running from arguments where we discuss reasonable evidence. Stop getting sidelined by people who aren't.I've rather had it with being labelled 'weak minded' or even a 'moron' as an acceptable form of argument on this site.
This is a prime example of you ignoring a discussion at the level you accept and triggering on arguments that insult you. Instead, if you were interested in truth, you would shrug off the insults (you can't expect to control strangers on the internet), and you would respond to the reasonable challenges to the popular ideas you support.The main merit of the ideas you propose is their source- so what do you expect?
My guess is chair did exactly that which is why he stopped posting on this thread. Oops.From the get-go, you weren’t polite. Go back and read your very first post.
My guess is chair did exactly that which is why he stopped posting on this thread. Oops.
Darwin was a racist. He thought aborigines were an evolutionary link between monkeys and humans.Real science is racist.
How many biological parts are required to make one living cell? How can that single cell magically create itself if its parts are dissolved before the assembly is finished? How many different biological pieces must have been first randomly created before being randomly assembled with no help from God?Please explain why the fact that the "chemical building blocks of life" dissolve in water is a problem.
Francis Crick did breakthrough research on DNA, for which he received a Nobel Prize. He understood from his studies in microbiology that life could not possibly have originated on earth without God because to do so would have required violating many known scientific facts. So Crick came up with a different possibility, called the panspermia theory. That theory rests on the idea that aliens brought biological dust to earth on spaceships and sprinkled the dust into the earth's atmosphere. Somehow his theory was widely accepted and promoted by secularists with an aversion to God.Oddly enough, most scientists would disagree with you about "what science shows".
I'm back, but only in a very limited fashion.If you're going to complain about how we run the site, then maybe it's time for you to take a break.
If you're going to posture about how you're thinking about leaving, then I'm going to temp ban you until you figure it out.
Come back when your ban is up. Or don't. Up to you.
Maybe JR can come up with a very limited ban - Deny you the use of a third of the letters on your keyboard?I'm back, but only in a very limited fashion.
There's actually an odd thing about bans. The details are available in the forum, or in the forum messages- but when banned, you don't have access to those.Maybe JR can come up with a very limited ban - Deny you the use of a third of the letters on your keyboard?