Guilty questionProve it
Guilty questionProve it
No. Sham investigations like the Jan. 6 witchhunt are not realm investigations. They are cover-ups.The only problem with what you're saying here is that investigations into fraud have been done, repeatedly, and most everyone in leadership in the Republican Party, from Mike Pence on down, agrees that there was no widespread fraud, and that you're full of it.
You can believe democrats and republicans do not commit voter fraud but you are wrong. You can accept election results with appearances of fraud if you like but that does not answer the evidence of fraud. Democrats, in particular, have been committing voter fraud for decades, including massive fraud in 2020, and now that they have stolen monopolistic power in DC they are trying to rewrite election laws so fraud and the monopoly of democrat power in DC will be protected forever, as in a communist dictatorship.The irony is hilarious. Unlike yourself, I accept facts and truth whether favourable or not. In 2016 I accepted the results of the election that put Trump in office. Didn't like the result but there was no point in whining and snivelling about it. Just hoped that after four years of the petulant clown in power that sanity would prevail and he'd be booted out in the following election and that's what happened.
Facts don't care about opinions and sensibilities. The reality of the situation is that Biden won the election, has been president for the best part of a year and Trump lost. You can cry, whinge, stamp your feet all you want it isn't going to change the facts.
The people trying to gather evidence are covering up and the people refusing to provide details are truth-seekers? What a backwards world you live in.No. Sham investigations like the Jan. 6 witchhunt are not realm investigations. They are cover-ups.
The people trying to gather evidence
the people refusing to provide details
My understanding is some videos have not been released because they may reveal escape protocols and mechanisms at the Capitol. A lot of footage is available.are the republicans seeking the thousands of hours of video from the Capital.
are the democrats refusing to release the videos.
My understanding is some videos have not been released because they may reveal escape protocols and mechanisms at the Capitol.
A lot of footage is available.
Additionally, all the footage not open to the public is available to the investigation which includes two Republicans. Bannon has released nothing, while Meadows released some but not all relevant information which is clearly discoverable.And you actually believe that lame excuse?
I'll bet not the most exculpatory footage.
The investigation does not include two republicans. It includes two RINOs.Additionally, all the footage not open to the public is available to the investigation which includes two Republicans.
This shows that the term RINOs has become meaningless. Chaney is more conservative than Trump. Look at her stand on issues and legislation and tell us what you find.The investigation does not include two republicans. It includes two RINOs.
Chaney is more conservative than Trump.
Voter fraud is real. Ignorance of voter fraud is also real. Lying about voter fraud and covering up voter fraud is also real. We live in a real world.The people trying to gather evidence are covering up and the people refusing to provide details are truth-seekers? What a backwards world you live in.
95% of Trump supporters at the Capitol on Jan 6 were not engaged in any violence whatsoever. The democrats lie by painting a mostly peaceful demonstration as extremely violent and hundreds of extremely violent leftist riots as mostly peaceful.The people trying to gather evidence are covering up and the people refusing to provide details are truth-seekers? What a backwards world you live in.
A good man has made a film that highlights some of the hundreds of videos that prove the Trump supporters at the Capitol on Jan 6 were by far largely well-behaved, peaceful protesters.My understanding is some videos have not been released because they may reveal escape protocols and mechanisms at the Capitol. A lot of footage is available.
Don't look to politicians or lawyers or political operatives to honestly depict the truth. Look to thousands of good Americans who were there and recorded their own videos of what really happened.Additionally, all the footage not open to the public is available to the investigation which includes two Republicans. Bannon has released nothing, while Meadows released some but not all relevant information which is clearly discoverable.
So your estimate is that one in every twenty Trump supporters was violent. Let's go with that, The nonviolent ones contributed to mob mentality and enabled the violence, did they not? (except the ones who confronted the violent acts_ and there were a few.)95% of Trump supporters at the Capitol on Jan 6 were not engaged in any violence whatsoever.
Yes - sometimes the media minimized the violence during civil rights protests, just like you are trying to minimize what the Trunp supporters did. Why don't you learn from the media's mistake?The democrats lie by painting a mostly peaceful demonstration as extremely violent and hundreds of extremely violent leftist riots as mostly peaceful.
Yes I always trust accomplices of a crime to give an unbiased account, NOT.Don't look to politicians or lawyers or political operatives to honestly depict the truth. Look to thousands of good Americans who were there and recorded their own videos of what really happened.
... one in every Trump supporter ...
Are you having a stroke?... the Trunp supporters ...
Key stroke errors, Feel free to point them out. You can be my little proofreader. It will give you a purpose around here.Are you having a stroke?
Christian Trump supporters did not incite violence, but leftists pretending to be Trump followers and government officials pretending to be Trump supporters did.So your estimate is that one in every twenty Trump supporters was violent. Let's go with that, The nonviolent ones contributed to mob mentality and enabled the violence, did they not? (except the ones who confronted the violent acts_ and there were a few.)
Yes - sometimes the media minimized the violence during civil rights protests, just like you are trying to minimize what the Trunp supporters did. Why don't you learn from the media's mistake?