Ukraine Crisis

[7djengo7]

Why would I do that?

What a stupid question. Because you want to stop Putin and protect the lives of Ukrainians. Don't you?

Do you want to stop Putin and protect the lives of Ukrainians? Yes or No?

Are you suggesting that since I disagree with Trump I should go fight?

How exactly do you "disagree with Trump"? Both you and Trump are not risking your lives fighting against Putin, so you're obviously not disagreeing with Trump.

Sorry, but I have to pick and choose how I respond to Trump's ignorant anti-democracy policies.

How does your constant TDS-raving in internet forums help the Ukrainians whose well-being you pretend you care about, and how does it defeat Putin?

Oh, also, which do you hate more: President Trump or Vladimir Putin?

I just dont think that sending my 78 year old fanny over there would be appropriate or do much good

What "good" do you imagine you're doing by leaving the Ukrainians -- whose lives you pretend you care about -- to fight Putin all by themselves while you sit at home typing?

 

[ok doser]

I just dont think that sending my 78 year old fanny over there would be appropriate or do much good ...

I think your 78-year-old fanny would be just as effective as cannon fodder as young Ukrainian people.

 

[Idolater]

Zelensky: Trump meeting was ‘regrettable,’ but Ukraine is ready to negotiate peace | CNN

lite.cnn.com

“Regarding the agreement on minerals and security, Ukraine is ready to sign it in any time and in any convenient format. We see this agreement as a step toward greater security and solid security guarantees, and I truly hope it will work effectively,” [Zelensky] said.

According to President Trump, this was the idea all along. If there are American civilians working in Ukraine on mining, then this serves as security guarantee because Putin's not a nihilist, and he would know he can't invade Ukraine with Americans working there, without provoking direct American action.

Take the W Vol.

 

[7djengo7]

But sorry, using your analysis the US should still be part of England

The U.S. was never part of England. It was established by the Americans when the Americans kicked the king of England's predatory forces out of America.

 

[ok doser]

 

[ok doser]

I am confused.

It's understandable. You are immersed in the propaganda of the mainstream media. You don't know how to think about this stuff independently. For instance I suspect that you're being told right now that this is a good thing:

Moscow Reacts Fiercely to Macron’s Nuclear Rhetoric, Calling It ‘Nuclear Blackmail’ – What Can France’s 290 Warheads Do Against the Massive, 6,000-Strong Russian Arsenal? | The Gateway Pundit | by Paul Serran

Tensions escalate as Russian officials respond sharply to President Macron's nuclear statements, drawing historical comparisons and highlighting the precarious nature of international relations. This analysis offers critical insights into the ongoing geopolitical landscape.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[ok doser]

They started the first two and it's been 80 years so, long overdue

 

[Idolater]

Playing the role of Churchill this time around is President Trump.

Let's see if Churchill can prevail upon the parties to prevent the larger war from starting. If they only listened to Churchill WWII and the Soviet Union wouldn't have been more than historical footnotes, and the Cold War wouldn't have even happened.

 

[ok doser]

 

[Avajs]

Playing the role of Churchill this time around is President Trump.

Let's see if Churchill can prevail upon the parties to prevent the larger war from starting. If they only listened to Churchill WWII and the Soviet Union wouldn't have been more than historical footnotes, and the Cold War wouldn't have even happened.

How would Churchill have prevented WWII?

 

[ok doser]

How would Churchill have prevented WWII?

By preventing the illegal military build up of Germany in the interwar period