Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Of course it's elevated by not watching Fox. You'd have to be deluded to think otherwise.
Ukraine Crisis
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
Right Divider
Body part
CNN tells him the "truth".
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I don't watch CNN.
Right Divider
Body part
I thought that you had said that you did in a previous post.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Nope.
Me neither … unless MSNBC isn’t available. I certainly don’t watch FAUX news.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I don't watch any of those to be honest and Fox isn't even close to proper news reporting...
Admittedly one of the criteria I use is that the network continues to expose the sleazy, hypocritical Republicans…
Last edited:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
MSNBC - the network that tried to destroy Nicholas Sandmann?
There is a guy to pray for.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I've heard he has defected, hoping he has good security.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Oh. You think people have an "elevated position" because they cut off news sources in an environment where "at least they have a variety."
You're a bundle of contradictions.
As this thread seems to have forgotten about Ukraine, (OP), has anyone heard anymore from them lately?
It seems to be a news-blackout-zone since the surrender of the Azov battalion.
I am hoping it is because the free-world supplied arms are starting to roll in and make a difference.
That and the fact the Russians are probably watching everything aired by all the reporters once broadcasting from the Ukrainian countryside.
I know I saw things the Russians were sure to acknowledge.
For instance...Early in the assault on Kiev, we often saw the satellite images of the roads lined with Russian vehicles.
After a couple of weeks, the vehicles disappeared under the trees.
Had that info not been aired, those roads would have remained choked with targets.
Perhaps "military" minds have awakened.
It seems to be a news-blackout-zone since the surrender of the Azov battalion.
I am hoping it is because the free-world supplied arms are starting to roll in and make a difference.
That and the fact the Russians are probably watching everything aired by all the reporters once broadcasting from the Ukrainian countryside.
I know I saw things the Russians were sure to acknowledge.
For instance...Early in the assault on Kiev, we often saw the satellite images of the roads lined with Russian vehicles.
After a couple of weeks, the vehicles disappeared under the trees.
Had that info not been aired, those roads would have remained choked with targets.
Perhaps "military" minds have awakened.
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
It's called discernment. I could access infowars & The Gateway Pundit if I wanted to but as I value credible news I don't. No contradictions here.
What sources do you access?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Depends on what the subject matter is but where it comes to war coverage then the BBC is a first port of call. I've followed the likes of veteran war correspondents such as John Simpson & Jeremy Bowen for years.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
I start with CNN, knowing full well they electioneer for Democrats, but that doesn't completely obscure the . . . news. The headlines. What's happening around the world, that's new. Put a bunch of new's together, and it's news. What's news? What's new. (False etymology right there, to be clear.)
CNN basically reports all the news that's worth being on most news outlets' front pages. I also look at the New York Times, just the headlines. Whenever I do this I see what CNN already told me, so NYT corroborates that CNN isn't blowing smoke.
But NYT also electioneers for the Dems, and I know this full well. Particularly the columns, opinions and editorials on NYT, and all other links, clearly indicate it is homebase for Dems.
And when I click to the Wall Street Journal (before it 'cookie-crashes' their webpage) I see the same headlines there as I see in CNN and NYT. WSJ electioneers for Republicans.
The headlines are unanimous. They are bipartisan. They are a supermajority. All the serious, professional journalists report the news, the headlines, the new's of the day. They slant, they spin, they rhetorically explain and they tell their narratives, but you can see through that, to the actual news.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Now that's fair enough and a similar method to what I do where it comes to corroborating news albeit with differing outlets.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
I don't understand the purpose in not doing something similar.