What on earth are you babbling on about now, ASC? You know I seldom read or post on your thread. Only when I am feeling especially generous.
too big to ignore
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
What on earth are you babbling on about now, ASC? You know I seldom read or post on your thread. Only when I am feeling especially generous.
I know this is out of your area of expertise (i.e. making excuses for moral degenerates), but this thread is about abortion and how to go about controlling the slaughter of the innocents.
I bet you thought it was yet another one of Neut's gossip threads huh Sandy?
No *Officer* ... unlike yourself, I don't have the obsession to turn every thread on TOL into one about homosexuality. The fact that you do is just .... odd.
Oh, what a surprise, Sandy now can read my "babbling".
The question is:
Can Sandy read the "babble" of a pro life journalist from Lifesitenews.com that shows the connection between homosexuality and abortion?
Why are there always rainbow flags at pro-abortion rallies?
"...Practically speaking, the pro-abortion and homosexual camps have far more in common than the multi-coloured condoms they shell out to whoever happens to be caught unaware. It is a well-known fact that the homosexual movement has a record of being staunchly pro-abortion. This includes very close social and political ties with pro-abortion powerhouses, including Planned Parenthood, which often includes financial support as well. It’s no coincidence that many pro-abortion activists advertise their solidarity with gay- friendly groups in an even more overtly public fashion.
For example, we are all familiar with those charming ditties that pro-lifers are often faced with at various events and rallies, including the very inclusive, “Gay, straight, black, white! All unite for women’s rights!” And who could forget the chart-topping hit, “anti-woman, anti-gay, right-wing bigots go away”! While these heartwarming toe-tappers sound fairly tame, they, like our sign-toting sideliners at the March for Life, demonstrate the familial relationship between the two groups.
The question is, why?
An essential component of being pro-life is an openness to life. On an ideological level, homosexuality tends towards being individualistic; in a practical sense, profoundly sterile. Homosexuality uses sex as an instrument for self-gratifying pleasure, and cannot physically be used in the unitive and procreative way it was intended. When couples “mutually masturbate” for their own intensive desire, the procreative element is eliminated, thus becoming an inescapable rejection of life. With the rejection of life, easily comes the destruction of life, making it impossible to negate one without the other. Both camps strive for the acceptance of sex without consequence, thus aligning themselves with like-minded individuals. It’s a match made in heaven..."
http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/why-are-there-always-rainbow-flags-at-pro-abortion-rallies
You posted to *me*. :duh: You should get some rest.
Not until the babies stop dying by the millions.
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
I think Chrys wins the "Dumb and deluded" award for this thread. My least favorite poster (You know who you are) may well be second, but Chrys definitely owned "Stupid" for this thread.
The Republican Party is just as much the party of death as the Democrats. This goes beyond abortion. And there are too many special interests in keeping this particular "Freedom" around for the Feds to ever give it back to the states where abortion can and should be criminalized according to the 10th amendment of the US constitution.
When all the "Women's body" people start agreeing with me that heroin should be legal and people should be allowed to own machine guns if they want, and that everyone should be able to keep the money they earn (No income taxes) than maybe we can have a serious conversation about "Bodily freedom." Until then its all smoke and mirrors. As long as these evil people that want to take every penny we earn to combat drugs, guns, and Islam have the power to pretend like they support freedom by allowing the murder of the most vulnerable members of the United States, they will do so.
The Federal Government needs to be destroyed, it is a beast that cannot be reformed.
The Republican Party is just as much the party of death as the Democrats. This goes beyond abortion. And there are too many special interests in keeping this particular "Freedom" around for the Feds to ever give it back to the states where abortion can and should be criminalized according to the 10th amendment of the US constitution.
When all the "Women's body" people start agreeing with me that heroin should be legal and people should be allowed to own machine guns if they want, and that everyone should be able to keep the money they earn (No income taxes) than maybe we can have a serious conversation about "Bodily freedom." Until then its all smoke and mirrors. As long as these evil people that want to take every penny we earn to combat drugs, guns, and Islam have the power to pretend like they support freedom by allowing the murder of the most vulnerable members of the United States, they will do so.
The Federal Government needs to be destroyed, it is a beast that cannot be reformed.
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
Texas Republicans did a tiny bit of what needed to be done. Good for them. But that doesn't mean I'm going to vote for the children of satan otherwise known as "Republicans" anytime soon.
Give me more guys like Rand Paul, Justin Amash, or Ron Paul in the GOP and I'll vote for them. Otherwise, no.
Give me more guys like Rand Paul, Justin Amash, or Ron Paul in the GOP and I'll vote for them. Otherwise, no.
Abortion-rights groups concerned about Sotomayor's stance
this is old
but
it shows how long its been since abortion was tested at the supreme court
this is old
but
it shows how long its been since abortion was tested at the supreme court
As long as she dots her i's and crosses her t's and gets it done promptly (withing 20 weeks) this bill declares the right of any woman to kill her baby, does it not?
Christ's Word
New member
I know some good Republicans still hanging on to their Democrat Light Party with a sprinkle of greed. They need to go the way of the Wigs. They have ceased to function as a check and balance on the just as evil Democrats and need to be replaced. If the libertarians would just get off their legalize drugs campaign, we could get on with dismantling the Republicans and form a real party to combat the evil of the Democrat/Socialists......
The fact that the Texas Republicans have passed a law to protect some unborn children is the least of my concerns about Republicans.
Christ's Word
New member
ACW- I agree with you and see the same things wrong here in Missouri that you see. I also think that incrementalism is a technique that the libtards have used with too much success, and the fact that Republicans are using it to save babies is a good start. Having said that, I would agree wholeheartedly that a Texas law to outlaw any and all abortions would have been a better solution, it just did not have the political steam to pass.
Two weeks prior to this premature human beings birth, the new Texas abortion law, if passed, would allow this little boy to be murdered.
Can you live with that?
you seem to be ignoring the fact that they have to get it by the courts
don't you think they took that into consideration?
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
A change from a situation in which women could still murder their children AFTER 20 weeks.
Its a stupid law, but its not an evil law.
Imagine a country in which murder of any child whatsoever, all the way up to the 18th birthday, were to exist.
A law was passed to prohibit killing of any children past the 12th birthday.
Is this "condoning" the murder of children up to 12 years old? Not really. Its saving the lives of children from 13-17. They aren't where they need to be, they should be saving the lives of every child, and the party that supports the very limited law above shouldn't really take any pride in it. I'm not saying you should vote for that party, especially when it sucks on so many other issues.
But ultimately, would you vote to save the kids from 13-17? I would. That doesn't mean I condone killing kids up until their 12th birthday.
My point is: making a law that further restricts the conditions under which murder is legal does not condone the rest of those murders.
Some of you guys are so fanatical that you would refuse to vote for a law that defined life as beginning at implantation because you couldn't ban abortion if you couldn't ban the pill at the same time. Absolutely ridiculous.
I'm not sure what your problem with the libertarian drug stance, particularly considering that most libertarians would leave those types of issues to the states anyway.
I've never met a libertarian that primarily focused on that issue.
Personally, I'd love to see the libertarian and constitution parties merge, and I see no good reason they shouldn't be able too. Leave things like drug policy to the states. Its not that hard.
Yet you support the legislation. If this legislation should make it through the courts, it will be the first time in Republican Party history where they no longer acknowledge that life starts at conception, but at 20 weeks.
WizardofOz
New member
Having this law on the books is better than not having it.
The "all or nothing" mentality of some prevents the protection of more lives than we would otherwise have.
The "all or nothing" mentality of some prevents the protection of more lives than we would otherwise have.