toldailytopic: Should transsexuals be allowed to compete in a women's beauty pageant?

[Iconoclast]

If they can pass the Genetic test that proves they are female then yes..

Oh but they can't can they since their femaleness is just a delusion a way for them to try to deny that they are just a gay man who has given himself over to his lust for male anatomy. Thus they believe that if they act and dress like a woman then their sexual deviancy will be socially acceptable. :comeout:

 

[MaryContrary]

Looks like my guess was pretty accurate.

:think:

"Right" and "wrong" have no meaning for me. And I'm guessing that's the end of this conversation, (if I can call it that)?

Yes, having no understanding of "right" and "wrong" does rather end the conversation, considering the topic.

Are you trying to blame me for having nothing to say here?

 

[Traditio]

No. The only reason I would watch a beauty pageant is to oggle the attractive women who are competing. If I were to oggle someone whom I thought to be an attractive woman when, in fact, that person ended up being a guy...that'd just make me feel wrong. :nono:

 

[faramir77]

Trannys are ridiculously absurd monsters, and therefore comedic gold.
i don't know about talent competitions, but they should definatly be allowed to participate in Mainstream Sports.
How funny would it be to see some she-monster get stomped by a 300lb line-backer, fore-checked into the boards, pummled by Mike Tyson or trying to seriously compete in Australian Rugby?
Dude. that be totallyhilarious, and, add some freak-show spectacle to the mix.

 

[bybee]

Trannys are ridiculously absurd monsters, and therefore comedic gold.
i don't know about talent competitions, but they should definatly be allowed to participate in Mainstream Sports.
How funny would it be to see some she-monster get stomped by a 300lb line-backer, fore-checked into the boards, pummled by Mike Tyson or trying to seriously compete in Australian Rugby?
Dude. that be totallyhilarious, and, add some freak-show spectacle to the mix.

Something like the Roman gladiatorial circuses? Pap for the masses?
What kind of masses would that be?

 

[MaryContrary]

Trannys are ridiculously absurd monsters, and therefore comedic gold.
i don't know about talent competitions, but they should definatly be allowed to participate in Mainstream Sports.
How funny would it be to see some she-monster get stomped by a 300lb line-backer, fore-checked into the boards, pummled by Mike Tyson or trying to seriously compete in Australian Rugby?
Dude. that be totallyhilarious, and, add some freak-show spectacle to the mix.

Not channeling a lot of compassion for the lost today, hm?

:think:

But, yeah. That would be pretty funny.

Trannie fight

[Erm...didn't realize the "A" word was going to show up in the title. I'll have to find another video later, without curse words, for this spot.] :mmph:

 

[John Mortimer]

:think:

Yes, having no understanding of "right" and "wrong" does rather end the conversation, considering the topic.

I didn't say I didn't understand the concepts of "Right" & "Wrong"... I said they have no real meaning for me. Right-wrong is a dualistic construct. The idea being that there are 2 opposite poles, "Absolute Right" & "Absolute Wrong" and value judgements can then be made by placing whatever is to be judged on a scale between the 2 opposites.
This is nothing but an artificial construct. There IS absolute right, but the concept of "absolute wrong" is an illusion. There can be relative "wrong", but being relative this has no absolute meaning.

So you see, I don't think you are wrong, (or right), to be offended by transsexuals in a female beauty pageant... you simply ARE offended. Your taking offence doesn't bother me.

 

[MaryContrary]

I didn't say I didn't understand the concepts of "Right" & "Wrong"... I said they have no real meaning for me. Right-wrong is a dualistic construct. The idea being that there are 2 opposite poles, "Absolute Right" & "Absolute Wrong" and value judgements can then be made by placing whatever is to be judged on a scale between the 2 opposites.
This is nothing but an artificial construct. There IS absolute right, but the concept of "absolute wrong" is an illusion. There can...

Yeah, sorry. I would have finished reading your post but there was that thing where you rendered your opinion completely useless.

 

[Guyver]

The TheologyOnline.com TOPIC OF THE DAY for March 27th, 2012 08:23 AM

toldailytopic: Should transsexuals be allowed to compete in a women's beauty pageant?

That you would even have to ask the question shows just how wrong this world actually is.

I wonder if anyone else can see that?

 

[some other dude]

Should women be allowed to compete in a transsexual beauty pageant?

 

[vegascowboy]

Miss Universe Canada Disqualifies Transsexual Contestant: She was Born a Boy

Miss Universe Canada officials have banned 23-year-old transsexual Jenna Talackova from participating in the pageant finals to be held in Toronto in May, 2012. The Vancouver contestant was one of sixty-five women chosen to compete in the national contest (which is owned by Donald Trump). The Daily Mail Reports that Denis Davila, national director of Miss Universe Canada, asserts that every contestant must be a "naturally born female." Critics of the decision claim that the rules do not specifically address sex change or plastic surgery.

read more

That's just nasty.

:vomit:

 

[John Mortimer]

Yeah, sorry. I would have finished reading your post but there was that thing where you rendered your opinion completely useless.

Well, if you believe the concept of "absolute wrong" points to something real, I'd be very interested to read your description of it.

 

[MaryContrary]

Well, if you believe the concept of "absolute wrong" points to something real, I'd be very interested to read your description of it.

Murder is absolutely wrong. Knock yourself out.

 

[John Mortimer]

Murder is absolutely wrong. Knock yourself out.

Murder is always a relative concept. Someone killing someone else can be "murder" in the eyes of one person whilst perfectly justified in the eyes of another. Thus it is relative to the perception of individuals.

 

[some other dude]

Eating live babies is always wrong

 

[serpentdove]

That you would even have to ask the question shows just how wrong this world actually is.

I wonder if anyone else can see that?

I see it (Mt 19:4). :vomit:

 

[Sherman]

I see it (Mt 19:4). :vomit:

Yep. Trans-sexuality is so wrong in all counts. That is how far our culture has drifted from morality.

Trans-sexual is just a fancy term for cross dressing pervert or a pervert that had plastic surgery.

 

[serpentdove]

Eating live babies is always wrong

John Mortimer's signature line reads: "I'm beautiful in my way, 'cause God makes no mistakes." ~ Lady Gaga

When a man dresses as a woman, God has not made a mistake. The man has sinned (Deut 22:5). :vomit:

"Some folks say that bears go around eatin' babies raw..." ~ Lyle Lovett, Bears

...Me :skeptic: I just bear up to my lain: bewildered best. :shocked:

 

[serpentdove]

Yep. Trans-sexuality is so wrong in all counts. That is how far our culture has drifted from morality.

Trans-sexual is just a fancy term for cross dressing pervert or a pervert that had plastic surgery.

The answer is of course, no--:vomit: God help us :shocked:--no! Ro 1:28

 

[MaryContrary]

Murder is always a relative concept. Someone killing someone else can be "murder" in the eyes of one person whilst perfectly justified in the eyes of another. Thus it is relative to the perception of individuals.

No, there's no such thing as justified murder. Murder is defined by the fact that it is not justified. Would it be easier if I'd said "unjustified killing"?

The fact remains that you confuse reality with perception. How you perceive a thing has no bearing on what it is. It is what it is. But, as I indicated before, if you're going to fall back on solipsism then you render your opinion useless. Why are you arguing with yourself? :freak: