Arthur Brain
Well-known member
All the methods are in the link. By all means, please show how you can "destroy" them.
toldailytopic "Evolutionary theory isn't about the origin of life"
- Thread starter 7djengo7
- Start date
All the methods are in the link. By all means, please show how you can "destroy" them.
Right Divider
Body part
You do it here all the time.
A materialist is someone that believes that only material things exist (i.e., the physical world). Since you seemed to be so well educated in "evolution", I thought that you would know this term. Carl Sagan demonstrates this sort of belief when he said something to the effect, "The cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be". That's materialism.
Over and over and over and over we go.
Radiometric data is based on A MINIMUM of three ASSUMPTIONS. Measuring things in science does NOT use assumptions.
Please go learn about radiometric dating so that we can have an intelligent discussion.
Claiming that something is true because of how many people believe it is a LOGICAL FALLACY.
Define the perceived difference between "physical light" and spiritual light. The light was good for creation's illumination.
Doesn't both the physical and the non physical emanate from God? How can any emanation occur otherwise?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, no. You're just smarting because your OP has been absolutely debunked and your ego won't allow you to admit it. I'm guessing you're not very old as you're certainly not very mature.
Here it is again:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12052-010-0225-1
Case closed.
Right Divider
Body part
Because it is not valid science. Scientific measurements are NOT based on MULTIPLE ASSUMPTIONS.
Destruction is yours and you can't hide under rocks.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No, I really don't. I don't juggle hamsters by the same token.
In the secondary definition, as I clarified.
I've already read up on it and it's more complex than your description of it. How about you get to "destroying" it?
Which I haven't claimed in any way, shape or form to start with. Theories come into being and are accepted because of the evidence that supports them, otherwise they wouldn't become theories to start with.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Delete.
What is the origin of life?
Right Divider
Body part
Please explain how a theory based on MULTIPLE unprovable ASSUMPTIONS produces anything but nonsense.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Maybe you need to read up on just how the age of the universe has been determined. You don't seem to get how scientific theories come into being as it is given recent posts. It's certainly not through a popular vote.
Evolution is a theory that causes errors in thinking, and assumptions about observable science which leads to erroneous conclusions about the natural world.
Like everybody being taught that Wolves and Dogs are a different species.
They can be interbred, and produce viable offspring; yet, so many ignorant believers in the evolutionary faith have a deep belief they are a different species.
This mistaken belief has been perpetuated by media, and kept in the biology books as a fact; though it's been disproven by observable science.
The belief in evolution causes people to come to false conclusions about the living things on this planet. This is why it's a bad idea to believe an obvious lie.
The theory of evolution is created or arranged in a way that seems artificial and unrealistic.
Just like sports at a university uses funds that should be invested in their education and art departments; evolution theory, and the funds used on trying to make a dead horse live, could be better spent on real observable science.
http://evolutionissues.com/dinosaurs-modern-mammals-birds-coexisted.php
=M=
Like everybody being taught that Wolves and Dogs are a different species.
They can be interbred, and produce viable offspring; yet, so many ignorant believers in the evolutionary faith have a deep belief they are a different species.
This mistaken belief has been perpetuated by media, and kept in the biology books as a fact; though it's been disproven by observable science.
The belief in evolution causes people to come to false conclusions about the living things on this planet. This is why it's a bad idea to believe an obvious lie.
The theory of evolution is created or arranged in a way that seems artificial and unrealistic.
Just like sports at a university uses funds that should be invested in their education and art departments; evolution theory, and the funds used on trying to make a dead horse live, could be better spent on real observable science.
http://evolutionissues.com/dinosaurs-modern-mammals-birds-coexisted.php
=M=
Tell me how scientific theories came into being or anything did.
Oh, sorry; didn’t mean to double post: just thought it didn’t get posted originally for some reason, and wanted arthur to see it.
Why do you believe in evolution Arthur?
Do you find it odd that evolution theory has man descending from a different species with different functional anatomy in 3.5 million years, while all the other species on earth are believed to have remained anatomically indifferent; not gaining any new functional anatomy for tens and in some cases hundreds of millions of years?
I mean, do you explain that by believing man was manipulated by aliens, or fell into the same few the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles did?
Just wondering about what you really believe... To see what form of crazy Evol logic we are working with here...
=M=
=M=
Why do you believe in evolution Arthur?
Do you find it odd that evolution theory has man descending from a different species with different functional anatomy in 3.5 million years, while all the other species on earth are believed to have remained anatomically indifferent; not gaining any new functional anatomy for tens and in some cases hundreds of millions of years?
I mean, do you explain that by believing man was manipulated by aliens, or fell into the same few the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles did?
Just wondering about what you really believe... To see what form of crazy Evol logic we are working with here...
=M=
=M=
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Why did you close your case of Kleenex though you're still crying so pitifully?
In your link, you say that
If something is not about origins at all, then it is not about the origins of species. So, you're admitting that evolution is not about the origins of species.
You geniuses feel no shame in flat out contradicting, out of one side of your mouth, what you just got done saying out of the other. "Evolution is about the origin of species; evolution is not about origins at all."
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Scientific theories come into being because of evidence. It's really not that difficult to understand. They don't come about through some personal whim but through stringent and continual testing that supports the data. If the evidence didn't support the theory of evolution then it wouldn't have become such. The theory of gravity exists by that same token.
What I find odd is that there's still people who are so set in their doctrinal belief systems whereby science is considered a threat to faith or belief. To rational people there's no actual dissonance between the two. Attempting to mock science from a YEC perspective is pretty ironic.
That’s “Gew”, not “Few”:
Sorry for errors; it’s hard to type all this up on an iPhone.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
What you have agreed upon through popular vote is to call the cloud of pompous nonsense you call "the theory of evolution", "the theory of evolution". And, you call that vote, "science".