have you ever had a reasonable dialogue with anyone here?
Only with the sane!
have you ever had a reasonable dialogue with anyone here?
Blasphemy -
throughout your posting you discredit the Bible, the written Word of God. you cast aspersions; calumny, on the authors and the Holy Spirit of God. you allude to a higher level of truth and understanding; spirit, something beyond the Bible and outside of Christianity -
you encourage and promote doubting the Word of God, instead focusing on self. you use words like a politician under the guise of a Hindu Christian, promoting your material and the material of like-minded heretics. you add and subtract from the Word of God.
for some satanic reason you particularly attack Paul, perhaps as an attention grabber. i don't judge you and enjoy your light-hearted approach and humor, most of the time - lately you never seem to be spreading peace and love and Free Light - preach the good news of your interpretations instead of focusing on your findings of contradictions in the Bible (which don't exist) -
enjoy the free light of God today on earth . . . oh, they re-named it to Urantai ? but nobody got the memo ? :chuckle:
enjoy the free light of God today on earth . . . oh, they re-named it to Urantai ? but nobody got the memo ? :chuckle:
Already responded here <------------
Also see post #498
If interested in the UB, we've supplied ample information and resources for your own research. It is only a particular organization of celestials that call our planet 'Urantia', hence the book's name. If not interested, divert your energies elsewhere.
Research can do wonders
pj
In 12 months we will have new presidential candidates
That must be important
it might make interesting dialogue
or not
Surely that can't be important.do you now understand what reasonable is?
Surely that can't be important.
Already responded here <------------
Also see post #498
Also see the post he responded to BEFORE post # 498
If interested in the UB, we've supplied ample information and resources for your own research. It is only a particular organization of celestials that call our planet 'Urantia', hence the book's name. If not interested, divert your energies elsewhere.
Research can do wonders
pj
when you divert your energies to something besides attacking God's Word, Jesus Christ, Saint Paul and MAD here on TOL. my energy is well spent displaying your agenda. the only real attention you can achieve is by mentioning Paul and MAD.
in addition, you say "the SO-CALLED TEACHINGS OF JESUS" - and cast aspersion on the entire Bible. it's very transparent to me, and then you desire people to RESEARCH what you research; the occult - divert yourself pj -
The agenda here is 'discussion'. Anything else is 'assumed'. I've made clear my views about Paul here and elsewhere. We have other threads on Paul linked in that post.
Again, you're all over the map here in your assumption. You don't know for sure, neither have 100% absolute proof that you have all of Jesus words written down verbatim, and how much of that is distorted, interpolated, or merely just here-say, and that was my point. You have to take it by faith, and whatever other historical testimonies or records exist, on determining what Jesus taught, and then 'interpretation' of those sayings is another ball-game.
My recognition of problems within the gospel-records and the fact of other non-canonical/apocryphal and modern day revelations supposed to be coming from 'Jesus' or of his teachings...are just that,..the recognition of the total picture here of the 'personality' of Jesus and the religion that arose or was built up upon him.
Remember,...there is a whole religious cult-ure built up as a religion ABOUT Jesus,...then there is the religion OF Jesus. There is a distinction here in how things play out. Jesus teachings call us to LIVE the same religion that Jesus lived, his way of life, faith, devotion, commitment to doing God's will.
To assume this somehow casts 'aspersions' upon the WHOLE BIBLE is ridiculous. Some books in the Bible are more valid, inspired or pertinent than others, it all depends on how such information relates to reality, especially here in the 'now'. We also have 'progressive revelation'.
pj
Now that's good dialogue.![]()
do you think it is reasonable?
Do you?
I get it now.