But how can you vote for the most pro abortion President ever and still call yourself anti abortion
I didn't realize that you did that ...
But how can you vote for the most pro abortion President ever and still call yourself anti abortion
The only real common link here however would probably be a common enemy :idea:, now which group of self-righteous interfering busybodies could that possibly be I wonder? :think:
As shown in the article, the link is:
"Both camps strive for the acceptance of sex without consequence."
http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Youth_Blog&id=26
I presume you already have understood that the womens movement and the gay movement are closely linked. How so? The way I see it, is because they happened fairly simultaneously. You have perhaps heard of the “Stonewall riots” in 1969. This is considered to be the catalyst of the modern gay movement.
Feminists and homosexuals quickly realised the benefits in supporting each other on the issue. They both needed a suitable antagonist. For the women the antagonist was the man, and for the [homo]sexuals the antagonist was the heterosexual. If you combine the two, you get the straight man!
The perfect target for the combined movements, and the perfect link.
Because when you think about it – there is really no logical reason for homosexuals and women to “team up”. In nature, they should also be antagonists. To me personally, the gay movement stand out as the righteous one, whereas the womens movement is based on the false notion that women too were opressed. Well, women never went to jail or were considered to be mentally ill because of being women, were they?
Anyway, because of the above mentioned link, AND THIS IS THE IMPORTANT PART FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND, you can probably expect that the majority of gay men and close to a hundred percent of lesbian women, consider themselves to be feminists. Personally I view “my kind” as brainwashed. In most universities LGBT courses are a part of women`s studies.
A far stronger and more formidable link - and one more important and relevant - which predates the abortion link and which has more power is the link between academic feminism and LGBTQ rights.
Well, that's kind of dumb, because it is very illuminating, and it certainly is well-backed up by persons, references, and sources other than this reader.A Gay Reader Weighs in on Relationship Between Feminism and Gay Rights
I'm really not interested in what a proud and unrepentant homosexual from Norway (or New York for that matter) has to say.
Well, that's kind of dumb, because it is very illuminating, and it certainly is well-backed up by persons, references, and sources other than this reader.
I hope that men such as Matt Barber, Peter LaBarbera, (maybe Brian Brown and Scott Lively :think: ) and others, will continue to be warriors in the face of it. And that reversals and modifications will happen throughout public policy while we wait for their warrior actions to produce something.That being said, what do you propose to do about a movement that Matt Barber rightfully called "the sexual anarchy movement"?
I hope that men such as Matt Barber, Peter LaBarbera, (maybe Brian Brown and Scott Lively :think: ) and others, will continue to be warriors in the face of it. And that reversals and modifications will happen throughout public policy while we wait for their warrior actions to produce something.
Perhaps making them less accessible and less popular would help somewhat?When you say "public policy", you surely aren't talking about passing laws against such things as abortion and homosexuality are you?
http://americansfortruth.com/2014/0...oses-nudity-filled-up-your-alley-street-fair/San Francisco AFTER the Public Nudity Ban
Peter LaBarbera
Perhaps making them less accessible and less popular would help somewhat?
By imposing severe restrictions, access, limitations - it can be done. Defunding? restricting minors? Limiting what may be taught in schools? COUNTERing with opposing teachings?How does a country make abortion clinics and a lifestyle that indoctrinates children into believing that homosexuality is normal "less accessible"?
By imposing severe restrictions, access, limitations - it can be done. Defunding? restricting minors? Limiting what may be taught in schools? COUNTERing with opposing teachings?
Why don't you comment on Peter's new pics. ? I think it's very important ........ :think:
Do you say the same of Peter LaBarbera? That he only takes such pictures and displays them because he likes to look at them? Maybe Peter WANTS me to put the word out? :think: (anyway, you missed a good selection )Oh, you mean LAWS that prohibit such things as abortion and homosexuality?
I've stated before that you and your ahem...guy friend SammyT just go to the AFTAH website to look at pictures of nekked males; this only confirms my suspicions.
Do you say the same of Peter LaBarbera? That he only takes such pictures and displays them because he likes to look at them? Maybe Peter WANTS me to put the word out? :think: (anyway, you missed a good selection )
Oh, by the way, I am not flustered. :AMR1: :mock:
And I am writing to Peter to tell him what you are saying :AMR1:
I noticed that we're not talking about laws that criminalize abortion and homosexuality any longer. How come?
Seek help son.
Some mother would die having a baby
I believe Sproul in his book on abortion said the the conception happens long before the sperm even touches the egg. There's lots of intent and emotions during forplay or lovemaking that conception begins there. Perhaps the sperm is as dumb as a rock and waits for instructions from the minds on what to do. So conception begins in the mind, perhaps it begins with love on first site.