lightninboy said:
I admit it is frustrating to me that God apparently didn’t tell Peter about the Gentiles sooner, but I am looking for the answer to that.
I have a feeling you will always be frustrated by this without Mid Acts to help.
Paul gave the answer as to why God didn't tell Peter, or anyone else for that matter when he wrote this:
Ephesians 3
1 For this reason I, Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for you Gentiles— 2 if indeed you have heard of the
dispensation of the grace of God which was given to me for you, 3 how that by revelation He made known to me the mystery (as I have briefly written already, 4 by which, when you read, you may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ), 5
which in other ages was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to His holy apostles and prophets: 6 that the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ through the gospel, 7 of which I became a minister according to the gift of the grace of God given to me by the effective working of His power.
Note the bolded text above. God gave this the message for the Gentiles to Paul. Paul plainly says it above. He also says it wasn't revealed before, but NOW is shown to the apostles. Not before, not during the other ages, now, in the dispensation of Grace. Paul is the minister of this message.
Peter wasn't. None of the other apostles were ministers of it, it was Paul who was given it.
Here is more evidence that Grace was not made known to the apostles until after Paul:
Galatians 2
1 Then after fourteen years I
[Paul] went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and also took Titus with me. 2
And I went up by revelation, and communicated to them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to those who were of reputation, lest by any means I might run, or had run, in vain. 3 Yet not even Titus who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised. 4 And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage), 5 to whom we did not yield submission even for an hour, that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.
6 But from those who seemed to be something—whatever they were, it makes no difference to me; God shows personal favoritism to no man—for those who seemed to be something added nothing to me. 7 But on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel for the uncircumcised had been committed to me, as the gospel for the circumcised was to Peter 8(for He who worked effectively in Peter for the apostleship to the circumcised also worked effectively in me toward the Gentiles), 9 and when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that had been given to me, they gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship,
that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised.
The 12 were always taught to go to the Jews, all along, and they taught law. Paul came along and taught Grace, no law, to the Gentiles. They agreed that their audience was different, and to take their messages to their right audiences. Note that Peter was given the gospel for the circumcised.
The word Gospel means good news. The news, itself, is the same, that Jesus died to save sinners. But to one group, that salvation was available by faith and sustained by Grace, the other Group salvation was available by faith and sustained by works.
I know the desire to teach and to be right is strong inside, I too had to renounce Acts 2, and doing so opened my eyes to the Bible.
#168 One of the primary purposes of the Law was to declare what is right and what is wrong. So the Law was designed to bring us to brokenness.
Close enough... The law showed us we were broken.
#170 Salvation in the old covenant was not limited to the circumcised.
Salvation has always been about having faith in what God tells you. The hearers of the law needed to have faith in it and follow it to gain salvation. Those who never heard the law were to have faith in whatever message God revealed to them. So yes, you could be saved without the Mosaic law, but you still had to abide in faith in what God told you about, AND only if you never heard the law.
Salvation came by faith, abiding by the law sustained that faith for that dispensation.
#171 The covenant of grace supersedes the covenant of the law and thus abolishes the law as a supposed way of salvation. The law can never give salvation; in fact, the law does not make a man an heir, it makes him a criminal who deserves the wrath of God.
Not exactly. The following the law is not possible, and so salvation by following it is impossible, but that fact never means that you are free from following the law. It just means It won't save you. What will save you is your faith in the revelation God gave you, and that salvation is made possible by Jesus' death - whether you knew that or not.
The law had built into it a means of gaining forgiveness, which was sacrifice. That was fulfilled later by Jesus. So by keeping the fulfilled law, even when you broke it, you were realizing the faith you had In Jesus and that was accounted to you as righteous, so long as you tried to keep the law.
But when God went to the Gentiles, he just allowed faith to be sustained by Grace. It was Paul who was given this message. Not before.