You seem to have the skewed notion that making a lot of money is different from producing wealth.
Yes. For example, a businessman who puts together a company that brings a useful new product into the market, is producing wealth. A person who is very good at speculation in markets, is merely making a lot of money. A CEO who loses vast amounts of money for his stockholders, but convinces the board to pay him a huge salary is making a lot of money, but not producing wealth. A very successful burglar is also making a lot of money but not producing wealth. Making a lot of money and producing wealth aren't the same thing, although it a fully open market economy, they usually would be.
I suppose you also think that the only thing that should be measured is labor?
If you include things like design, planning, leadership, and so on as labor, I suppose so. I'm noticing that many CEOs get fabulously lavish compensation,even when they damage the companies they lead. Stockholders end up losing, and often the employees do also.
There are laws that make this possible, and those need to be removed to allow market forces to determine compensation.