That's Libertarianmillions of vulnerable citizens to the "tender mercies" of the private sector!
That's Libertarianmillions of vulnerable citizens to the "tender mercies" of the private sector!
Presumably "patrick jane" would have us believe that the take-away message from Christ's "Parable of the Good Samaritan" would be that instead of demonstrating compassion, we should defer to "libertarian" principles by abandoning our less fortunate "neighbours" to the mercies of the private marketplace - how very "Christian" of us!That's Libertarian
Real facts are, that the demoncrats doubled the debt from 10 to 20 trillion, left the Middle East in chaos and left us with failing Obamacare. Obama is a crook
if we're going to pay for it with our taxes and i get a tax refund, can i take it in mexicans?
awwww
i was hoping to get salma hayek
U.S. interest rates may pose risk to Trump budget's optimistic assumptions If President Donald Trump's budget does touch off an economic boom that pushes growth up to 3 percent a year as it assumes, the government's borrowing is likely to cost much more than has been factored into the administration's fiscal proposals. Along with costing the government more, rising rates could crimp spending among households and companies, cutting into the very growth that the administration is counting on to eliminate government deficits over the next decade. Economists say there is a rough, but direct, tie between economic growth and the 10-year Treasury bond used as a benchmark in government budgeting. If the U.S. economy did shift into a higher gear and begin growing at 3 percent on a sustained basis, Treasury bond yields would likely move far beyond the 3.8 percent rate the administration has assumed - possibly edging towards 5 percent based on historical data. That would push the Federal Reserve into a broad reassessment of its own policy that has so far been one of incremental and slow interest rate rises to keep the economy growing. "The rough rule of thumb is that the average 10-year yield should be sort of close to (gross domestic product) growth," which in the current budget would be 5 percent including an assumed inflation rate of around 2 percent, said Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist for Capital Economics. "Trump's budget is a return to the pre-financial crisis world," where the rate curve from the Fed's overnight lending to the longest-term bonds were higher across the board, he said. The net effect on interest rates would be complex, hinging on whether government deficits do in fact decline as the administration contends - a fact that would offset the higher cost of issuing new bonds - and how the higher interest rate environment affects economic growth. It would also depend on how the Fed reacts, and whether inflation in that environment remains a tame and steady 2 percent. The Treasury rate projection is just one of a number of assumptions in the Trump budget that economists have criticized, with the assumed return to 3 percent growth regarded as notably unrealistic. Trend U.S. growth is currently considered to be around 2 percent, low by historic standards but now regarded as a likely norm in an economy that is aging, and in which the annual growth in worker productivity has slowed. |
Yeppers.Sounds good. Spend tax dollars on what they exist for, which is wiping out jihadists and executing murderers.
A new government analysis of President Donald Trump's budget plan says it wouldn't come close to balancing the federal ledger like the White House has promised. Thursday's Congressional Budget Office report says that Trump's budget, if followed to the letter, would result in a $720 billion deficit at the end of 10 years instead of the slight surplus promised. CBO said Trump's budget would reduce the deficit by a total of $3.3 trillion over 10 years instead of the $5.6 trillion deficit cut promised by the White House. The nonpartisan scorekeeper estimated that deficits in each of the coming 10 years will exceed the $585 billion in red ink posted last year. CBO says that Trump relied on far too optimistic predictions of economic growth and that Trump's rosy projections are the chief reason his budget doesn't balance as promised. "Nearly all of that (deficit) difference arises because the administration projects higher revenue projections — stemming mainly from a projection of faster economic growth," CBO said. Trump's budget predicts that the U.S. economy will soon ramp up to annual growth in gross domestic product of 3 percent; CBO's long-term projections predict annual GDP growth averaging 1.9 percent. "The CBO report shows that the president built his budget on fantasy projections," said Rep. John Yarmuth of Kentucky, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee. Trump's May budget submission proposed jarring, politically unrealistic cuts to the social safety net for the poor and a swath of other domestic programs. Many of its recommendations were deemed dead on arrival and are being ignored by Republicans controlling Congress. CBO also said that the Trump budget contained too little detail to accurately predict its effects on the economy. The White House promised that its juiced-up economic projections will produce $2.1 trillion in deficit reduction, mostly from overhauling the tax code and reducing the burden regulations have on the economy. But Trump's tax overhaul plan is so far so sketchy that it can fit on a single page. |
As long as Donald Trump doesn't exceed Obama's spending, he'll make himself look good (i.e. he can still be a big government spender and republicans will say "At least he doesn't spend as much as Obama did!").
.......he has indicated that we wants to increase military spending by 10% ($54 billion), increase law enforcement budgets and increase infrastructure budgets.
He wants to make cuts at the EPA, foreign aid and non-defense federal agencies.......
Amen!!
Any real conservative will say AMEN to increasing military spending and law enforcement budgets and cutting the EPA, foreign aid and non-defense federal agencies.
You're a Republican, not a (fiscal) conservative.Are you the conservative you claim to be or are you the liar I know you are.
Any fiscal conservative would like to decrease spending and balance a budget for once. I am all for cutting the EPA, foreign aid, etc. We spend far too much and need to cut more. We don't need to increase the deficit, which is exactly what Trump is going to do. He's spending quite liberally. :think:
Any "real" conservative will have a problem with that.
You're a Republican, not a (fiscal) conservative.