This SHOULD be the top story being talked about globally - not only the results of the study, but the fact that the mainstream media is deliberately refusing to report on it.
A new study concluding lockdowns 'should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument' was ignored by the vast majority of the liberal media.
www.foxnews.com
Sometimes it's a shame that the words 'liberal' and 'conservative' are used improperly. In this story they use 'liberal' to mean Democrat basically, same with how the media talk about the Supreme Court; they call basically Republican justices 'conservatives' and Dems 'liberals', but the words themselves really mean something else.
In this case, lockdowns are actually 'conservative', where conservative means basically 'paternalistic'; more-or-less somewhat 'overbearing'. And being against lockdowns is actually 'liberal', where we just trust people to exercise their God-given rights in whatever lawful way that they see fit.
It's liberal to let people do as they wish, and conservative to make them stay inside 'for their own good', and 'whether they like it or not'.