Right Divider
Body part
Real Christians are totally rational. So you lose.No - semi-rational.
Real Christians are totally rational. So you lose.No - semi-rational.
Real Christians are humble and have a capacity for empathy. That leaves you out.Real Christians are totally rational. So you lose.
You have no clue how a Christian behaves.Real Christians are humble and have a capacity for empathy. That leaves you out.
So, you believe Christians are not humble nor do they have a capacity for empathy? Interesting. It would explain your stance.You have no clue how a Christian behaves.
Your false accusations don't help support your claims.So, you believe Christians are not humble nor do they have a capacity for empathy? Interesting. It would explain your stance.
Why can't more Christians be like blueball?
Which is anti-Christian on its face. I always thought skeeters were anti-Christian, every time one sucked my blood.That's like saying "Why can't more Christians be like anti-Christians?"
Which is anti-Christian on its face. I always thought skeeters were anti-Christian, every time one sucked my blood.
So, you believe Christians are not humble nor do they have a capacity for empathy?
How more straightforward can you get than calling himself "Skeeter"?Well, you didn't expect him to just come out straightforwardly and call himself, "Bloodsucker," did you?
How more straightforward can you get than calling himself "Skeeter"?
I prefer him because he seems reasonable and kind.It all depends on whether, by your word, "Christians," you are actually referring to Christians, or, instead, are referring to anti-Christians such as @blueboy. Obviously Christians do not believe that anti-Christians such as blueboy and yourself are humble, nor do we believe they/you have much, if any, capacity for empathy.
What you think is reasonable is not.I prefer him because he seems reasonable and kind.
So true.I never said anything about me. I am not very humble.
And yet you complain about Christian empathy here on this site. Hypocrite!I have a capacity for empathy but use it sparingly on this site.
I am not very humble.
I have a capacity for empathy
but use it sparingly on this site.
Probably because a defensive stance, and need to project my strengths over my weaknesses.Why?
I offer no proof other than my general demeanor.Proof?
I am under attack more often than not. And, I am critical of many views held sacred.Why?
Get in line....I am under attack more often than not. And, I am critical of many views held sacred.
I came to see what was being said about fossils, instead it's a liberal crying (again).I prefer him because he seems reasonable and kind.
Probably because a defensive stance,
and need to project my strengths over my weaknesses.
I offer no proof other than my general demeanor.
I am under attack more often than not. And, I am critical of many views held sacred.
I defend my point of view and my integrity.Have you defended something? If so, what?
This thread is not the end all and be all. All my posts as a whole demonstrate my strengths and weaknesses, I will let others be the judge.What "strengths" have you been projecting in this thread?
Nope.So, your having written what you've written in this thread is supposed to be thought "proof" for your claim that you "have a capacity for empathy"?
You are conflating terms. I encourage people to critique my views. And, I enjoy critiquing other worldviews. That is why I am here. However, this can occur without personal attacks, ie general aspersions of my character and tirades about what liberals are.It's interesting that you characterize others' being critical of views you hold sacred as you being "under attack," while then using the words, "I am critical of many views held sacred," to characterize your attack on others.
This thread is not the end all and be all. All my posts as a whole demonstrate my strengths and weaknesses, I will let others be the judge.