Right Divider
Body part
LOL :banana:What chapter?
LOL :banana:What chapter?
John 14-16.
You can't miss it.
Read all of it, and think.
Jerry doesn't even know what the gospel of Christ is. He constantly confuses it with the gospel of God. :dizzy:
There is something said about the Husbandman in chapter 15 but it says nothing about His coming. You are just maling things up in the hope that no one will notice that you refused to address what I said here about the Husbandman:
Since you consider yourself an expert on the gospel of Christ then you will have no problem answer this question:
When was the gospel of Christ which saved preached to the Jew first?
"For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek" (Ro.1:16).
Why won't you answer? This should be easy for you to answer since you consider yourself an expert on the gospel of Christ.
LOL :banana:
I answered you a few days ago. I suspect heir's answer will be similar to mine.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4430308&postcount=333
As his custom was, Paul entered a synagogue and preached that Jesus is the Christ to the Jews and Greeks. Those who believed Jesus is the Christ were separated out and taught that Christ died for their sins, and was raised for their justification.
Here is what you said:
By the time when one of the Jews had believed that Jesus is the Christ they had already received life and were born of God:
"But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name" (Jn.20:31).
"Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God" (1 Jn.5:1).
How could a Jew who had already received life and therefore saved when he believed that Jesus is the Christ be saved AGAIN by believing that Christ died for our sins?
He was not saved by believing that Christ died for our sins because he was already saved.
Yep, it is impossible to find any Rapture in James.
You can say that only because you close your eyes to the truth that James speaks of an "imminent" coming of the Lord Jesus. You just stick your head in the sand and pretend that James said no such thing.
So, someone could believe Jesus is the Christ and deny 1 Cor 15:1-4, yet still be in the Body?
As his custom was, Paul entered a synagogue and preached that Jesus is the Christ to the Jews and Greeks. Those who believed Jesus is the Christ were separated out and taught that Christ died for their sins, and was raised for their justification.
I never said that. Of course those who already received life by believing that Jesus is the Christ could also believe the gospel that Christ died for our sins.
By the time when one of the Jews had believed that Jesus is the Christ they had already received life and were born of God:
"But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name" (Jn.20:31).
"Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God" (1 Jn.5:1).
How could a Jew who had already received life and therefore saved when he believed that Jesus is the Christ be saved AGAIN by believing that Christ died for our sins?
I know better. It's the Second Coming.
You know it too.
Once again you did not even address anything which I said in my last post. And it is obvious to anyone with an open mind that it is not the second coming.
Do you never tire of embarrassing yourself by refusing to even address my points and instead just sticking your head in the sand?
Leave 1 John where it belongs (in the trib), and you won't have an issue.
Why did you not say anything about John's words at John 20:31.
And you have not even come close to proving that I John is doctrine for the coming tribulation. During the tribulation the law will once again be in force so why would the author of Hebrews tell the Christian believers this?:
"For there is verily an annulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did...By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament" (Heb.7:18-19,22).
The 4 gospels and Hebrews-Revelation are all tribulation doctrine.
You know it.
Once again you just ignore the evidence which I gave you to prove that you are wrong. It is easy to see that your final authority is not the Bible but instead the teaching within the Neo-MAD community.
You will defend their teaching to the hilt but you just ignore what the Scriptures reveal.
Sad!
During the tribulation the law will once again be in force so why would the author of Hebrews tell the Christian believers this?:
"For there is verily an annulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did...By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament" (Heb.7:18-19,22).