What you say should be what scripture says.Reevaluate what?
What you say should be what scripture says.Reevaluate what?
The Ark held the Covenant >
< Mary held the New Covenant
I don't know what you mean by saying "as if that tribe wrote it". You need to evaluate if you want to speak this way any longer. I have no idea what you mean by "that tribe" but what you are saying has nothing to do with what I have shared with you.
As a Jew I know of the Torah. It is Jewish. The TaNaKh is Jewish. It is the Hebrew Bible. The New Testament is Jewish. These Scriptures or Writings tell us about Yeshua (Jesus) who is Jewish being a Jew. The early church, in its conception, was entirely Jewish. Believers from among the Gentiles were added to their number. They received the Spirit of God the same way the Jewish believers had.
Can you show me what I've said wrong? ThanksWhat you say should be what scripture says.
That tribe is Judah...what is so hard to understand about that?
To state something is Irish it means it was more than likely made in Ireland or by the Irish or for Irish or a combination of or all three...like an Irish ale...
Yet here you are stating the Torah, even the New Testament, is of one tribe Judah...which part? made in? by? or only for?
Now imagine 99% of Ireland rejected the ale as its own...but then one guy says "no I got my citizenship and can say I love it...so it must be Irish..."
Repeat as often as you like but it is still false...your tribe rejected God having another God...die and be resurrected especially...
I have already sent you a pm before my last response to you here, before I saw your post.Can you show me what I've said wrong? Thanks
Ok I'll look, thank youI have already sent you a pm before my last response to you here, before I saw your post.
You are welcome.Ok I'll look, thank you
Now you are saying I said something I didn't say.
Here is something you can study.
Judah the southern kingdom. Judah the tribe. The definition of a Jew. Judaism. Israel.
Paul only argued that the Gentiles did not need to be circumcised to associate with the tribe or to be saved...but the tribe was coming around claiming they had to be in order to merely associate and to be saved...
Paul was not preaching to the Gentiles but to Jews to stop circumcising their own children and quit the customs of Moses. (Acts 21:21) There was no limit to his arrogance.
Remember how there were goyim that followed them out of Egypt?...they were not circumcised and were still saved given sabbath even...and lived among them...and now again in Paul's time they were crowding into synagogues Sabbath after Sabbath.
Synagogues were not places for Gentiles to crowd in. Those were Jewish synagogues that Paul would overturn them and turn them into Christian churches. That's how he worked, as the cuckoo birds that would lay their eggs in other small birds' nests so that their little one be fed by a different mother.
But then the jealous tribal leaders came to insist upon circumcision first...well that was never the case and salvation through works was not the faith based gospel found since the OT...they agreed that these new goyim should at least keep from fornication and kosher as the more lenient "noahide"laws expected...
They were former Gentiles converted by the apostles of Jesus into the Sect of the Nazarenes and Paul, who could never raise a church from scratch, would build on the foundation of others.
But Paul never forbid circumcision...just insisted it was not salvific...never was but a sign one already was...and now in the Risen One.
Circumcision was never for salvation in Israel. Salvation from what? So, you believe that Paul never forbade circumcision! Read Acts 21:21. He would try to forbid circumcision even among the Jews Which was the climax of arrogance.
I don't know what you are talking about.Yes the one that charged the rest of Israel a tax to come and worship in the temple...a tax so high it started a civil war which divided Israel caused idolatry weakened her and finally destroyed her forever...the same tribe a conspiracy was found a long time ago...
I've answered you to explain what I meanYou are welcome.
Okay.I've answered you to explain what I mean
Paul was not preaching to the Gentiles but to Jews to stop circumcising their own children and quit the customs
of Moses. (Acts 21:21) There was no limit to his arrogance.
Synagogues were not places for Gentiles to crowd in. Those were Jewish synagogues that Paul would overturn them
and turn them into Christian churches. That's how he worked, as the cuckoo birds that would lay their eggs in other small birds' nests so that little one be fed by a different mother.
They were former Gentiles converted by the apostles of Jesus into the Sect of the Nazarenes and Paul, who could
never raise a church from scratch, would build on the foundation of others.
Circumcision was never for salvation in Israel. Salvation from what? So, you believe that Paul never forbade circumcision! Read Acts 21:21. He would try to forbid circumcision even among the Jews Which was the climax of
arrogance.
I don't know what you are talking about.
except Israel did not observe Judaism...nor did those that believed in HimIf you are a Jew you are of Israel and observe Judaism.
There is a person who is a Jew, a person who is Jewish, and a person who observes Judaism. This is all the same person. Whether you were born a Jew or you are a convert you are a Jew. Otherwise you are not a Jew.
The tribe of Judah to which you converted into despite One teaching of its rejection of Him...
except Israel did not observe Judaism...nor did those that believed in Him
All three would kick out any who claimed God had another God and He was killed and was resurrected...yup...they would probably stone him or have the Romans do something about it...they would certainly not allow those idolatrous blasphemers to remain one of them...
Also, you have here said I am of the tribe of Judah. I don't know why you say this.
You are right that being Jewish can mean that one is of the tribe of Judah. But I mean that I am a Jew, of Israel, and practicing Judaism, all by way of being a convert. I don't know where people get the idea that being Jewish means you are of the tribe of Judah. Maybe you do. I don't.Here is a hint you gave:
"As a Jew I know of the Torah. It is Jewish. The TaNaKh is Jewish. It is the Hebrew Bible. The New Testament is Jewish."
As I suspected... you are attempting to slander Paul by continuing the false witness of those who alleged things of Paul which were not true...and now here in chapter 21 he even took a vow to show he was faithful and obedient and not teaching what his accusers (you) were lying about him...instead James had him shave his head "that all may know that those things of which they were informed concerning you are nothing, but that you yourself also walk orderly and keep the law."
It's ok though, most Christians errorenously claim the same thing of Paul, namely that he did away with the law, certainly Sabbath, the dietary restrictions, festivals etc...but they do it for less diabolical reasons...maybe?